Livelihood Characteristics of the Fish Farmers in Ilorin, Kwara State Nigeria

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• John Oluwaseun Ifabiyi ¹
• Raufu Olushola Sanusi ¹
• Sola Emmanuel Komolafe ²

¹ Phoenix University Agwada, Nigeria

² University of Ilorin, Nigeria

10.22067/jrrp.v13i2.2307-1105

Abstract

Purpose- Fish farming is an important source of Livelihood and nutrition for several people involved in fishing activities in Nigeria. This study aims to assess the Livelihood characteristics of the fish farmers in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.
Design/methodology/approach- The study was carried-out in Ilorin Kwara State, Nigeria. Ilorin is the Capital of Kwara State. The Research involved a 3-stage sampling procedure. The first stage involved a purposive selection of two (Ilorin East and Ilorin West) Local Government Areas in Ilorin due to the prevalence of fishing activities in the area. The second stage involved a purposive selection of five fishing settlements along the river bank in each of the two local Government Areas and the third stage involved the random selection of ten fish farmers within the fishing settlements. A total of 150 fish farmers were randomly selected for this research work. Descriptive statistics such as frequency count, percentage, and mean were employed to analyze the data. The questionnaire was the instrument used for data collection.
Findings Findings: The findings showed that involvement in other income-generating activities (mean=3.81) was the highest-ranked financial asset. Owned/leased fish ponds (mean=3.51) was the highest-ranked physical asset. The ability to network with the extension agents/experts for fish production (mean=3.61) was the highest-ranked social asset. Physically fit to carry out the fish production activities (mean=3.73) was the highest-ranked human asset. Access to water for fish production (mean=3.70) was the highest-ranked natural asset. The overall Livelihood status of the fish farmers was High (mean=3.38).
Originality/value: This study is important as it would provide up-to-date information on the livelihoods of fish farmers which would drive the governments’ policy and interventions towards the fish farmers in Nigeria.  Also, the Agricultural extension programme aimed to improve fish farmers’ livelihood outcomes in fish production in Kwara State, Nigeria should improve their skills and information on areas of need which include pond water treatment, construction, and maintenance were the leading information needed by fish farmers, and to help the fish farmers overcome the factors limiting their production. 

Keywords

• Livelihood
• Status
• Characteristics
• Fish Farmers
• Nigeria

Main Subjects

• Rural Studies

---

References

1. Adesope, O., Asiabaka, C. C., & Agumagu, A. C. (2007). Effect of personal characteristics of extension managers and supervisors on information technology needs in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 3(2), 4-15. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42362/
2. Adisa, R. S., Mustapha, A. M., Balogun, K. S., Ibrahim, H. K., & Oloyede, W. O. (2018). Analysis of Farm Management Extension Education System Services Performed by Extension Agents of Agricultural Development Projects in Southwest Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 8(1), 7-15. http://ijasrt.iau-shoushtar.ac.ir.
3. Adisa, R. S., Oluwaseun, I. J., & Gbenga, O. (2021). Determinants of capacity building needs of artisanal fishers in Kogi State, Nigeria. Journal of Asian Rural Studies, 5(1), 78-89. http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jars/article/view/2706
4. Akangbe, J.A., Ajiboye, G.E. and S.E. Komolafe (2015). Effects of improved fish production technology on the output of fish farmers in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. Ruhuna Journal of Science, 6, 50-62. https://rjs.sljol.info/articles/10.4038/rjs.v6i2.11?_rsc=dagaj
5. Bene, C., Barange, M., Subasinghe, R., Pinstrup-Andersen, P., Merino, G., Hemre, G.I. & Williams, M. (2015). Feeding 9 billion by 2050–putting fish back on the menu. Food Security, 7 (2), 261–274. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-015-0427-z
6. FAO (2012) The Prevention of losses in cured fish. FAO Fish Tech. Paper., (219): 87 p. ILOI Government of Norway (1984) Zmprousd Village Technology for Women’s Activities- Q Manual for West Africa.
7. FAO (2018). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 – Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals. Rome, Italy.
8. FAO (2019). The future of Livestock in Nigeria. Opportunities and Challenges in the face of Uncertainty. FAO, Rome, Italy.
9. (2022). The Nigerian Agriculture at a Glance. FAO, Rome, Italy. Available online at https://www.fao.org/nigeria/fao-in-nigeria/nigeria-at-a-glance/en/
10. FDF, (2008). Federal Department of Fisheries Statistics of Nigeria (4th ed.). Federal Department of Fisheries, Abuja pp41.
11. Ifabiyi O., Bello O.G., Komolafe S.E., Banjoko IK., & Ahmed S.A. (2023). Status of Climate Smart Aquaculture Practices in Ilorin West Local Government of Kwara State, Nigeria. Iraqi Journal of Aquaculture, 20 (1), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.58629/ijaq.v20i1.458
12. IfabiyiO., Komolafe S.E., & Adisa R.S (2022). Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) Model Analysis of Training Needs of Artisanal Fishers in Kwara State, Nigeria. Diyala Agricultural Science Journal, 14 (1), 54-65. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/19e9d34f617a41b4
13. IfabiyiO, Banjoko I.K., & Komolafe S.E. (2017). Assessment of the Training Needs of Artisanal Fishers’ in Asa Local Government Area of Kwara State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Rural Extension and Development, 11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359617559
14. Ifeanyi-obi, C. C., & Mathews-Njoku, E.C (2014). Socio-economic factors affecting choice of livelihood activities among rural dwellers in southeast Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 7(4), 52-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/2380-07415256
15. Nguthi, F. N., & Niehof, A. (2008). Effects of HIV/AIDS on the livelihood of banana-farming households in Central Kenya. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 56(3), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214(08)80006-1
16. Komolafe, S.E, Adesiji G.B and Akanbi, S.O (2022). The Contribution of Yam Farming Activities to Livelihoods of the Farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Jambura Agribusiness Journal, 4(1), 1-12. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jaj/article/view/13706/0
17. Ogunlade, I. (2007). Backyard Fish Farmers Information needs in Osun State, Nigeria. AAAE 2007 Conference proceedings pg. 165-169.
18. Okonta, A.A., & Ekelemu J K. (2005). A preliminary study of Micro- Organisms associated with fish spoilage in Asaba, Southern Nigeria. Proceedings of the 20th Annual conference of Fisheries Society of Nigeria (FISON), Port- Harcourt 14th-18th November.
19. Olaoye, O. J., & Oloruntoba, A. (2011). Determinants of aquaculture technologies adoption among fish farmers in Obafemi-Owode Local Government Area of Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Creative Arts 5 (1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.51406/jhssca.v5i1.986
20. Olorunfemi, T. O., Olorunfemi, O. D., Adebayo, S. A., Letsoalo, S. S., & Modirwa, S. (2019). Competency Needs of Extension Agents On Value Added Fish Production: Evidence From Kwara State, Nigeria. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension (SAJAE), 47(4). https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2019/v47n4a528
21. Pandey, R., Jha, S. K., Alatalo, J. M., Archie, K. M., & Gupta, A. K. (2017). Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities. Ecological indicators, 79, 338-346. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316682017
22. Turner, S. (2017). International encyclopedia of geography, 15 volume set: Livelihoods (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
23. WorldFish (2024). WorldFish 2023 Annual Report. Penang Malaysia: WorldFish. Annual Report:2024-2