Spatial Analysis of the Ecological Footprint of the Rural Settlements (Case Study: Eslamabad-e Gharb County)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mohsen Aghayari Hir ¹

Ali Mohammad Khorshiddoust ¹

Aeizh Azmi ²

Ashkan Shafiee ¹

¹ University of Tabriz, Iran.

² Razi University, Iran.

10.22067/jrrp.v13i1.2307-1082

Abstract

Purpose- Environmental issues such as the ecological footprint, are the product of intellectual, cultural, and economic factors. Therefore, it is necessary to know the variables effective on the amount of the footprint. The main objective of the present study is to investigate the factors affecting the ecological footprints of the rural settlements in Eslamabad-e Gharb County with a holistic and spatial approach.
 Design/methodology/approach- The present study is an applied one regarding the objective and descriptive-correlational regarding the methodology. In terms of the data collection method, it is a field survey. The statistical population includes 25% of the villages in Eslamabad-e Gharb County (40 villages). The sample size was determined as 500 households based on the latent and observable variables. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data. Also, the Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) was used to investigate the effects of the locative-spatial factors on the research variables.
Findings: The results of the Bootstrap test based on the T values indicated that the variables “ownership”, “environmental awareness”, and “consumerism” had the highest t-value and thus, were most correlated. The variable “ownership” in the economic structure is more correlated with the ecological footprint of the researched villages than other independent variables with a statistic of 26.053. overall, the analysis of the direct and inverse correlations in the SEM indicated that the variables “ownership” and “employment” were the most effective factors on the ecological footprint with coefficients of 0.874 and 0.575, while the “conspicuous consumption” was the least effective variable. Also, the results of spatial regression showed that the villages in the northwest of the county were more effective while moving towards the southeast and getting distant from the center reduces the effectiveness of the research variables on the ecological footprint.
Research limitations/implications- The high rate of employment in the agricultural sector, the weakness in environmental issues training, and the high rate of livestock and agricultural ownership among a limited number of people have created obstacles on the road to the ecological sustainability of the region.
Practical Solutions: Directing the residents of the researched villages towards non-agricultural employment by providing appropriate facilities and support, promoting an environment-friendly lifestyle, and training the residents to increase their environmental awareness by holding workshops in this field.
Originality / Value: The present study is the first to use the SEM and spatial approach to investigate the factors effective on the ecological footprints of rural settlements. The results obtained can aid the planners and decision-makers in the field of rural settlements to advance the goals of sustainable development.

Keywords

Ecological footprint

structural equations

geographically weighted regression

Eslamabasd-e Gharb

Subjects

• Rural Studies

---

References

1. Aghayari Hir, M., Khorshiddoust, A. M., Azmi, A., & Shafiee, A. (2023). The Ecological Sustainability Assessment of Rural Settlements with Emphasis on the Ecological Footprint (Case Study: Eslam Abad-e-Gharb). Community Development (Rural and Urban Communities), 14(2), 547-567. [In Persian] doi: 10.22059/jrd.2023.355037.668780
2. Alizade Aghdam, M., Banifatemeh, H., Abaszadeh, M., & Soltani Bahram, S. (2017). The Role of Cultural Capital in the Developing of Ecological Citizenship. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 9(2), 107-133. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22631/isih.2017.1754.2342
3. Amani, J.,Abbaszadeh, M. M. S.,Pashvi, Qasim., & Khezri-Azer, Hemen.(2013).An introduction to equating structural equations using the PLS method and its application in behavioral sciences with the introduction of software. Urmieh University Publications. [In Persian]
4. Ataei Hamadani, M., Shali Amini, V., Hamzehnejhad, M., & Naorouzborazjani, V. (2018). Review of the Iranian house on the basis of cultural ecologic theory. Urban and Rural Management. 16(49), 431-451. [In Persian] URL: http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-2107-en.html
5. Bekun, F. V., & Alola, A. A. (2019). Examining the trade-off between Economic Growth and Pollutant Emissions in South Africa: The Role of Energy Consumption and Total Natural Resources Rent.
6. Bidhendi, M., Karbasizadeh, A., & Shiravand, m. (2014). A Survey on the Role of Francis Bacon in Inaugurating Environmental Crises. Philosophical Meditations, 4(12), 121-142. [In Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285253.1393.4.12.5.1
7. Bogert, J., Ellers, J., Lewandowsky, S., Balgopal, M., & Harvey, J. (2022). Reviewing the relationship between neoliberal societies and nature: implications of the industrialized dominant social paradigm for a sustainable future. Ecology and Society, 27(2). 5751/ES-13134-270207
8. Bulte, E., & Van Kooten, G. C. (2000). Economic science, endangered species, and biodiversity loss. Conservation Biology, 14(1), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98390.x
9. Cheney, J. (1987). Eco-feminism and deep ecology. Environmental ethics, 9(2), 115-145. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19879229
10. Diamantopoulos, A. 2011. Incorporating Formative Measures into Covariance-Based Structural Equation MIS Quarterly 35, 335–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044046
11. Dobson, A. (2006). Ecological citizenship: A defence. Environmental politics, 15(03), 447-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010600627766
12. Grove, J. M., & Burch, W. R. (1997). A social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: a case study of Baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018591931544
13. Hair, J. F. (2011). Multivariate data analysis: An overview. International encyclopedia of statistical science, 904-907.
14. Hajian, M., & Kashani, S. J. (2021). Evolution of the concept of sustainability. From Brundtland Report to sustainable development goals. In Sustainable resource management (pp. 1-24). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00018-3
15. Hajilo, F. (2012). Sociological explanation of the ecological footprint and factors affecting it (the case study of Tabriz city), doctoral thesis of Isfahan University, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences. [In Persian]
16. Honarvar, H. (2018). Investigating the relationship between citizens' awareness of citizenship rights and its effect on the environmental health style of Tabriz citizens, Master's thesis of Tabriz University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. [In Persian]
17. Hassan, S. T., Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516
18. Hosseinzadeh Dalir, K., & Sasanpour, F. (2006). The Application of Ecological Footprints Method in Sustaining Metropolitan with Particular Emphasis Up on Tehran. Geographical Research, 21(3 (82)), 83-101. [In Persian] Https://Sid.Ir/Paper/29903/En
19. Hulland, J.‚ (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies‚ Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
20. IEA (2023), CO2 Emissions in 2023, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
21. Jin, W., Xu, L., & Yang, Z. (2009). Modeling a policy making framework for urban sustainability: Incorporating system dynamics into the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Economics, 68(12), 2938-2949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.010
22. Jomepour, M., Hataminejad, H., & Shahanavaz, S. (2013). An Investigation on Sustainable Development in Rasht County Using Ecological Footprint. Human Geography Research, 45(3), 191-208. [In Persian] doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2013.35252
23. Klemmer, C. L., & McNamara, K. A. (2020). Deep ecology and ecofeminism: Social work to address global environmental crisis. Affilia, 35(4), 503-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919894650
24. Lashkari, H., Keikhosravi, G., & Rezaei, A. (2009) The Analysis of the CROPWAT Model Efficiency Estimating Water Requirement of Wheat in the West of KermanshahTownships of the Islamabad Gharb, Sarpol Zahab and Ravansar. The Journal of Spatial Planning; 13 (1) :247-270. [In Persian] URL: http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-12349-fa.html
25. Lawrence, R. J. (2003). Human ecology and its applications. Landscape and urban planning, 65(1-2), 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00235-9
26. Magner, N., Welker, R.B., Campbell, T.L.‚ (1996). Testing a model of cognitive budgetary participation processes in a latent variable structural equations framework‚ Accounting and Business Research, 27 (1), Pp 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1996.9729530
27. Mehrara, A., Madanlujoibari, S., & Zare Zaidi, A. (2016). Examining the role of environmental protection in sustainable development. Shabak, 3(10), 85-95. [In Persian] https://sid.ir/paper/521249/fa
28. Missimer, M., Robèrt, K. H., Broman, G., & Sverdrup, H. (2010). Exploring the possibility of a systematic and generic approach to social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), 1107-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.024
29. Moodi, S., Ahmadizadeh, S., & Yousefi, E. (2021). Assessing the sustainability of urban development and calculating the biological capacity of Birjand city using the ecological footprint method. Journal of Natural Environment, 74(3), 435-450. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jne.2021.326289.2242
30. Moran, E.F. (2010). Environmental Social Science. Wiley-Blackwell Publication.215p.
31. Motefaker Azad, M. A., Khurshiddost, A. M. (2011). Environment and Islamic Attitude, Tabriz, Tabriz University Publications. [In Persian]
32. Motamedinia, Z., Mehdizade, H., & Popzan, A. (2013). Behavioral Attitude of Agricultural Enterprises to Environmental Pollution (Case Study:Kermanshah, Eslam Abad Gharb, Ilam, Ivan Gharb). Journal of Rural Research, 4(2), 429-450. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v12i2.2211-1062
33. Motesadi Zarandi, S., Nasiri, R., & Motlagh M, E. (2021) Modeling of the Relationships Between Spatio-Temporal Changes of Traffic Volume and Particulate Matter-2.5 Pollutant Concentration Based on Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) and Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) Model: A Case Study in Tehran Metropolis, Iran. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research; 19 (1), 21-34. [In Persian] http://sjsph.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5991-fa.html
34. Niemelä, J., Kotze, J., Ashworth, A., Brandmayr, P., Desender, K., New, T., Penev, L.,
    Samways, M., & Spence, J. (2000). The search for common anthropogenic impacts on
    biodiversity: a global network. Journal of Insect Conservation, 4(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009655127440
35. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Monthly Global Climate Report for December 2021, published online January 2022, retrieved on May 21, 2023 from https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/ access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202200.
36. Omidpanah, P. (1985).Ecology, Environmental Science, Isfahan. Isfahan University of Technology Jihad Publications.
37. Omisore, A. G. (2018). Attaining Sustainable Development Goals in sub-Saharan Africa; The need to address environmental challenges. Environmental development, 25, 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envdev.2017.09.002
38. Özbaş, E. E., Hunce, S. Y., Özcan, H. K., & Öngen, A. (2019). Ecological Footprint Calculation. Recycling and Reuse Approaches for Better Sustainability, 179-186.‏
39. Park, R. E. (2012). "Human Ecology": From American Journal of Sociology (1936). In The Urban Sociology Reader (pp. 83-90). Routledge.
40. Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2021). Forests and deforestation. Our world in data. Retrieved from:
41. Ruini, Campra L., Pratesi C. A., Marino M., Filareto A., (2010): What is Better for You Is Better For the Environment? The State of the Art in Ecological Footprint Theory and Applications, Academic Conference FOOTPRINT FORUM 2010, Short Communications, Colle Val d’Elsa, 9th-10th June 2010, Editor Simone Bastianoni, Pub. Global Footprint Network & Ecodynamics.
42. seif, A., & seyf, H. (2022). Factors Affecting on Environmental Behavior in the lived Experience of Environmental Activists (Case study: The Association Rescuers and Supporters of Gahrroud Ashtrankoh, Durood). Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 4(6), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.52547/ sdge.4.6.79
43. Soltani Bahram, S. (2015). Sociological study of ecological citizenship and factors related to it (case of study: citizens of Tabriz city). Ph.D. Thesis. Tabriz University. Faculty of Law and Social Sciences. [In Persian]
44. Taylor, P. W. (2011). Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics (Vol. 51). Princeton University Press.
45. Ukaga, O., Maser, C., & Reichenbach, M. (2010). Sustainable Development: Principle, Frameworks and Case Studies. London, CRC Press Taylor and Frances Group
46. UNEP, D. (2021). Partnership and United Nations Environment Programme (2021). Reducing consumer food waste using green and digital technologies, (1-96). https://unepccc.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2022/03/reducing-consumer-food -waste-using-green-and-digital-technologies.pdf
47. Venetoulis, J., & Talberth, J. (2010). Refining the ecological footprint. In Sustainable Development (pp. 83-120). CRC Press.
48. Vinzi, V.E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S.‚ (2010). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement‚ In Handbook of partial least squares (Pp 47-82). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_3 
49. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth (Vol. 9). New society publishers.
50. Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Erb, K., Haberl, H., & Schulz, N.B. (2004). Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961–1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach, Land Use Policy, 21: 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.landusepol.2003.10.007
51. Wang, C.B., Chou, Y.F., & Lee, J.Y. (2012). Ecological footprint of Taiwan: A discussion of its implications for urban and rural sustainable development. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36: 342-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.12.004
52. Wilson, J., & Anielski, M. (2004). Ecological footprints of Canadian municipalities and regions. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/20539833
53. Yang, L., Fang, X., & Zhu, J. (2022). Citizen environmental behavior from the perspective of psychological distance based on a visual analysis of bibliometrics and scientific knowledge mapping. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766907
54. Yin, K., Miao, Y., & Huang, C. (2022). Environmental regulation, technological innovation, and industrial structure upgrading. Energy & Environment, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221125645