An Evaluation of Paddy Field Consolidation Project with a Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Rural Households (Case Study: Choobar Rural District, Shaft County)

Document Type : Original Article




Purpose- Among the most important challenges in the agricultural sector are lack of optimal use of production factors, multiplicity of parcels and dispersion of agricultural lands. Land consolidation is one of the effective solutions which can change the size of fields and organize them to increase production, especially in paddy fields, which facilities agricultural development and ultimately achieves a sustainable livelihood in rural areas. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the success rate of paddy field consolidation project through the study of a group of farmers who are included in the land consolidation project.
Design/Method/Approach- The population of the study consisted of 285 farmers from 11 villages of Choobar rural district in Shaft County who have been selected by regular sampling method. To collect the data, library and survey methods (observation and questionnaires) have been used. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the reliability of the research tools, and in the analytical part, single-sample t-test was used to evaluate the success rate of the project in Choobar rural district; To investigate the relationship between land consolidation project and improvement in economic indicators of rural households, initially Spearman correlation coefficient was used, then simple regression test and coefficient of determination R2 were used to measure the effectiveness of the project on economic indicators.
Finding- The research findings on the level of economic and social dimensions and the assessment of the success rate of the project in Choobar rural district showed the project was moderately to highly successful in the study area. The effects of the project in improving the socio-economic indicators of rural households in Choobar rural district are such that the highest correlations were found between the project and economic indicators in the use of machinery, land infrastructure, productivity, household employment, ease of access to machinery and manpower, income, and investment; At the level of social indicators the highest correlations were respectively found in interpersonal and generalized trust, objective participation, sense of physical security, insurance services, formal participation, conflict reduction and institutional trust. From farmers’ perspective, among the socio-economic indicators, the infrastructure indicator which is created by the government and the use of machinery after the implementation of the project, and the ease of access to machinery and manpower, interpersonal and generalized trust have had the greatest impact on the implementation of the project.


  1. Allahyaria, M. S., Christos, A. D., Daghighi Masouleh. Z., & Ghorbania, M. (2018(. Land consolidation success in paddy fields of northern Iran: An assessment based on farmers’ satisfaction. Homepage,Land Use Policy. 73, 95–101.
  2. Aref, F., & Redzuan, M. (2009). Community leaders’ perceptions toward tourism impacts and level of building community capacity in tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2(3), 208-213.
  3. Asghari Lafmejani, S., Pourjafar Abadi, M., & Pour Ebrahimi, F. (2016). The role of strategic crops in the livelihoods of rural households (Case study: Pistachio cultivation in Sirjan County). Journal of Geographical Researches, 31(2), 50-61. [In Persian]
  4. Ashrafi, M., Hooshmand, M., and Keramatzadeh. (2014). Investigation of Agricultural Sustainable Development in Rural Areas, With an Emphasis on Economic Approach: A Case Study of Kashmar Villages. Journal of Rural Development Strategies. 2(2), 51-68. [In Persian]
  5. Bouzarjomehri, Kh., & Anzaei, E. (2012). Assessing the technological effects of modernization, renewal, and consolidation project for rice fields (Case study: Charetoghan rural district, Neka county). Journal of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 2(4), 39-58. [In Persian]
  6. Brooks, N., & Adger, W.N. (2005). Adaptation policy Frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies, policies and measure. In Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity. s (pp 165-182).
  7. Roknoddin Eftekhari, A. (1995). Different viewpoints in farming- land consolidation (part 1). Journal of Geographical Researches 36, 6907-6924. [In Persian]
  8. Roknoddin Eftekhari, A. (2003). Agricultural development (concepts, principles, methods, agricultural land consolidation planning). Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
  9. FAO. (2003). The design of land consolidation pilot projects in central and eastern europe. food and agriculture organization of the united nations. Rome.
  10. Ghaffari, H., Younesi., A. & Abedini, A. (2016). The role of land Consolidation on the agricultural sector productivity; Case study of Shazand city. Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 6(23), 37-54. [In Persian]
  11. Hadizadeh Bazaz, M., & Bouzarjomehri, Kh. (2017). An evaluation of the role of rural production cooperatives in the technical and economic empowering of farmers in Neishabour. Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 3(4), 443-459. [In Persian] DOI: 10.22048/rdsj.2017.13889.1058
  12. Haghighat, S., Iravani, H., Kalantari, Kh., Mahdavi, E., & Ghadimi, S.A. (2015). Analyses the influenced factors of the rejection of land integration (Case study: Fars Province). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 46(1), 21-34. [In Persian].
  13. Hasanzadeh, D. (2008). A community-based approach to the quality of life of local communities. Journal of Urban Management, 20, 7-22. [In Persian].
  14. Heidari Sareban., V. & Mjnouni, A. (2016). Survey social capacity- building impacts at the rate of community participation in the development activities, case study: Bonab County. Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 6(19), 89-104. [In Persian]
  15. Ismaili Dastjerdipour, A., Chizari, M., & Sedighi, H. (2014). Institutional approach to development in agriculture. The Journal of Planning and Budgeting, 3(126), 131-149. [In Persian]
  16. Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., and Daley, C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(2), 135-149.
  17. Lisec, A., Sevatdal, H., Bjerva, Q. B., & Ferlan, M. (2012). Comparative Analysis between Slovenia and Norwa, FIG Working Week. The institutional framework of land Consolidation Land Use Policy, 27, 545-549.
  18. Lowe, Ph., Ray. C., Ward, N., Wood, D., & Woodward, R. (2005). Participation in Rural Development. Center for Rural Economy. European Foundation for the improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
  19. Mahdavi, E., Kiani, M., & Daneshvar Ameri, Zh. (2017). Assessing barriers to agricultural consolidation. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 48(2), 333-342. [In Persian]
  20. Momeni, F., Dashtbani, S., & Banuie, A.A. (2017). The importance of agriculture in balancing urban and rural economic and social structure in Iran. Journal Space Economy & Rural Development, 4(22), 17-46. [In Persian].
  21. Moradi Masihi, V., & Talebi, M. (2017). Structural Analysis of Sustainable Rural Development Indicators Case: Sumehsara County Villages. Journal Space Economy and Rural Development, 3(21), 165-180. [In Persian]
  22. MSLC. (2002). The Munich statement on land consolidation as a tool for rural development in CEE/CIS counties. International FAO Symposium Land Fragmentation and Land Consolidation in Central and Eastern European Countries : a gate towards sustainable rural development in the new millennium, Munich (pp. 11-14). Retrieved from
  23. Nowrouzi, M., & Hayati, D. (2015). Factors affecting sustainable rural livelihoods as perceived by farmers in Kermanshah Province. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 1(1), 127-144. [In Persian].
  24. Okali, D., Okpara, E., & Olawoye, J. (2001). Rural-urban interactions and livelihood strategies series (the case of Aba and its region, southeastern Nigeria). London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
  25. Pishro, H.A., & Azizi, P. (2009). Sustainable agriculture development by agriculture incomes sustainability. Journal of Human Geography, 1(4), 1-20. [In Persian]
  26. Rezaie Moghadam, K., Rahimi, S., & Bakhshoude M. (2014). Individual, economic, social, environmental and agronomic factors affecting adoption of agricultural land consolidation by Wheat Growers in Shiraz County. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research. 22 (22), 135-157. [In Persian]
  27. Sayilan, H. (2014). Importance of land consolidation in the sustainable use of Turkey rural land resources. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120, 248-256.
  28. Tajeri Moghaddam, M., Pooralimardan, S., & Raheli, H. (2016). Assessing the extent of the inclination of farmers towards participation in the design of land consolidation (Case study: Central Sector Orzuie City of Kerman Province). Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 2(10), 255-265. [In Persian].
  29. Varmaziari, H., Rostami, F., & Geravandi, Sh. (2013). Modeling of effective institutions for iranian smallholder agriculture development from expert's viewpoint; with emphasis on NGOs. Journal of Community Development, 5(2), 133-156. [In Persian].
  30. Vitikainen, A. (2004). An overview of land consolidation in Europe. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1(1), 25-43.
  31. Yasouri, M., Javan, J., & Saboonchi, Z. (2012). Effects of social consolidation projects in rural areas. Journal of Geography and Planning, 40(40), 201-228. [In Persian].