Studying the Development of Rural Areas in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province Using PROMETHEE Method

Document Type : Scientific Articles


1 Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University

2 Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University

3 Amin University of Law Enforcement Sciences


Purpose- The cities of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province are in a deplorable condition in terms of rural development indices. The proper planning for optimal allocation of resources requires the analysis of development indices in the province, so that we can attain balanced and exhaustive development by capitalizing on existing forces and capacities of the cities to bring about prosperity and happiness for all people. In the present study, in order to identify the current status of development in the province and its rural areas, we have used eight effective criteria and 40 items (sub-criteria) to identify and classify rural areas in this city and rural areas.
Design/methodology/approach- This is a descriptive-analytical study with an applied approach that adopts a regional approach to the geographical area. In order to model the level of development, according to the goals of the research, the development indices of the province were collected based on library resources. After identifying and reviewing the study indices, the weight of each index was determined based on the mathematical models used in the PROMETHEE decision making method. Finally, the results were entered in GIS software and the output maps were drawn.
Findings- The results suggest that Boyer-Ahmad city with the highest net output flow is highly developed, followed by Basht and Lande cities.
Originality /Value- This paper is categorized as new rural studies as it investigates 602 villages in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province using a PROMETHEE decision-making method. The results of this study can have many implications for rural planning researchers.


1. Akbari, N., & Zahedi, M. (1387/2008). Application of multi-criteria ranking and decision-making methods (1st ed.). Tehran: Publications of the Organization of Municipalities and Villages of the country. [in Persian].
2. Aliaei, M., & Azizi, S. (1397/2018). Analysis of the level of development of rural areas using analytical method factor analysis method. Journal of Environmental Planning, 42, p.112. [in Persian].
3. Badri, A., Akbarian, S., & Jawaheri, H. (1385/2006). Determining the levels of development of rural areas in Kamyaran city. Journal of Geographical Research, 82, 116-130. [in Persian].
4. Badri, S., & Akbarian Ronizi, S. (1385/2006). A comparative study of the application of developmental assessment methods in regional studies. Journal of Geography and Development, 4, 5-22. [in Persian].
5. Daripoor, N., & Moradi, A. (1395/2016). Assessing the situation of tourism services in the cities of Khuzestan province using the PROMETHE technique. Sarzamin Geographical Quarterly, April 2017, 35, p.25. [in Persian].
6. Daripoor, N., & Moradi, A. (1396/2017). Prioritization of areas with ecotourism attractions using GIS and VP software. Case study: Khuzestan province. Fourth Scientific Conference on New Horizons in Geography. No. 4018, p.114. [in Persian].
7. Daripoor, N., Moradi, A., & Mansouri, Z. (1395/2016). Assessing the vulnerability of urban land uses in military threats by combining the PROMETHEE & GIS method. Case study: Ahvaz city. Paper presented at Fourth Scientific Research Congress on New Horizons in the Field of Engineering and Civil Engineering. [in Persian].
8. Falsoleiman, M., Mekaniki, J., & Eghtedari. M. (1398/2019). Spatial analysis of rural management performance in rural development process (Case study: Anbarabad rural districts in Kerman province). Journal of Physical Development Planning, 4, p.26. [in Persian].
9. Fathollahzadeh, S., & Mehdizadeh, R. (1392/2013). An overview of multi-criteria decision making methods. Paper presented Second National Conference on Modern Management Sciences. Golestan province. [in Persian].
10. Ghaffari, R., & Salehi, N. (1392/2013). Ranking the level of rural development using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method (Case study: Shahrekord city, Saman district). Journal of Geographical Research, 28(3), p,181. [in Persian].
11. Kalantari, K. (1377/1998). The concept and criteria of social development: Political-economic information. Tehran: Sharif. [in Persian].
12. Kalantari, K. (1389/2010). Data processing and analysis in socio-economic research (4th ed.). Tehran: Farhang Saba. [in Persian].
13. Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provincial Management and Planning Organization. (1396/2017). Statistical Yearbook of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provinces. p.112. [in Persian].
14. Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provincial Program and Budget Organization. (1393/2014). Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provincial Land Planning Scheme. p.98. [in Persian].
15. Mosayebi, S., Barghi, H., Rahimi, D., & Ghanbari, Y. (1396/2017). Prioritization of development strategies in rural areas with a sustainable development approach) Case study: Villages in the northwestern region of Isfahan province. Journal of Rural Research and Planning, 7(1), p.96. [in Persian].
16. Nazmafar, H., & Alibakhshi, A. (1396/2017), Measurement of spatial inequality in regional development. Case study: Khuzestan Province. Journal of Spatial Planning and Geography, 4(3), [in Persian].
17. Shojaeian, A., & Moradi, A. (1394/2015). Ranking urban service indicators using Sturgess and V-PROMETHEE models. Case study: cities of Hamadan province. Regional Planning Quarterly, 5(20), p.48. [in Persian].
18. Shojaeian, A., Omidypour, M., & Moradi, A. (1393/2014). Assessing the appropriateness of land for building cemetery using GIS, FTOPSISS and PROMETHEE models (Case study: Likk city). Journal of Geography and Urban Planning Zagros Perspective, (19), p.185. [in Persian].
19. Sojasi Qeydari, H., Sadeghloo, T., & Mahmoud, H. (1398/2019). Ranking villages based on bioavailability indicators (Case study: Nezamabad rural district in Azadshahr city). Human Geography Research, 51(1), p.12. [in Persian].
20. Straka, J., & Tuzova, M. (2016). Factors affecting development of rural areas in the Czech Republic: A literature review. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(6), 2141-2150.‏
21. Lee, Y. J., & Huang, C. M. (2007). Sustainability index for Taipei. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(6), 505-521.‏
22. Soares, J. O., Marquês, M. M. L., & Monteiro, C. M. F. (2003). A multivariate methodology to uncover regional disparities: A contribution to improve European Union and governmental decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 121-135.‏
23. The law of national administrative divisions. (1362/1983). Regulations of the Law on Definitions and criteria of national administrative Divisions in the Islamic Republic of Iran, approved on July 6, 1983 by the Islamic consultative assembly. [in Persian].
24. Polednikova, E. (2014). Multi-criteria analysis of regional disparities in the con-text of the EU cohesion. RAO. R. V.
25. Ziaian, P., Firoozabadi, A., & Vallahie, M. (1394/2015). Ranking the level of development of villages in Merhamatabad district of Miandoab city. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Rural Development Space, 4(4), p.133. [in Persian].
26. Ziari, K., Zanjirchi, M., & Sorkh Kamal, K. (1389/2010). Investigating and ranking the degree of development of the cities of Khorasan Razavi province using TOPSIS technique. Quarterly Journal of Human Geography Research, 72p.46. [in Persian].
Volume 9, Issue 3 - Serial Number 30
September 2020
Pages 71-86
  • Receive Date: 29 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 06 May 2020
  • Accept Date: 22 June 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 September 2020