Study of Socio-economic Factors Influencing on Adaptation of Smallholder Farmers to Climate Change in Mountainous Areas (Case study: Malavi Dehestan of Poldokhtar County)

Document Type : علمی

Authors

1 University of Sistan and Baluchestan

2 University of Giulan

Abstract

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
In mountainous areas where rainforest farming is carried out, climate change has a more negative impact on agriculture and the lives of rural households, especially smallholder farmers. These farmers have limited capacity and this vulnerability has always been a threat to their livelihoods. The most important reasons for this vulnerability include inappropriate livelihoods, resource constraints, low productivity, small agricultural land and lack of access to agricultural inputs such as organic fertilizers, seeds, and so on. These farmers, through the process of adaptation to climate change, can minimize climate threats. Climate change events, such as floods, droughts, warming and possible effects, significantly reduce assets, undermine livelihoods, reduce labor productivity and reduce farmers' social relationships. If the effects of these hazards do not be managed by adaptation strategies, it will lead to low yields of agricultural products. Therefore, proper understanding of the effects of these changes is necessary for farmers to take appropriate action and to identify the effective economic and social factors in this regard. Therefore, in this study, the socioeconomic factors influencing on adaptation of smallholder farmers to climate change was studied.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Adapting to climate change means reducing risk and vulnerability through actions, regulating practices and processes against threats and environmental damage. Adaptive Capacity means matching the attribute or behavior with external environment changes to better deal with these changes. Adaptation is described as the ability of social or environmental systems to adjust to change or to cope with changes. Level of adaptability and ability of farmers to face climate change is affected by various economic and social factors such as age, gender, educational level, marriage, income, employment, farm size, and so on. But the impact of these factors varies across societies, countries and regions.
3. METHODOLOGY
The research method is descriptive-analytical. In terms of purpose it is application oriented and in terms of method, it is a combination. Data collection has been done in both "library" and "field". The data gathering tool was a questionnaire. The statistical population consisted of farmers in Malavi village in Poldokhtar city, Lorestan province, Iran (N = 1636). Using Cochran formula, 310 farmers were selected as the sample by simple random sampling. To prove the existence of climate change, data from the Poldokhtar Meteorological Station is used. To identify the most important methods of adaptation to climate change, exploratory factor analysis (FA) is used, and to identify the economic and social factors affecting farmers' adaptation to climate change Logistic regression model is used.
4. DISCUSSION
Investigating farmers' adaptation with climate change has shown that the use of crop time adjustment method, soil and agricultural crop management method has been the most widely used among farmers. Farmers, using their experience, choose the right time to cultivate the crops. Soil management is also one of the most widely used methods for adapting to climate change. Farmers adapt themselves to climate change using this method, which involves strengthening and increasing the productivity of land by use of various types of green, animal and other types of fertilizers. Another widely used method for adapting to climate change which use by farmers is the management of crop production. This method, given that farmers cultivate different products, and the potential effects of climate change, such as product diseases, may occur on a product type and do not affect other product. Therefore, the remaining product can replace the damaged product. In this way, farmers adapt to these changes. In the context of socioeconomic factors influencing on adaptation of farmers, the results show that among the social factors, four variables, the age of the head of the family, the level of education, the experience of the farmer and the size of the family, and among the economic factors, four variables, size of Farm, farmer's capital, property ownership and household retention rate have the most relationship with the level of adaptation of farmers to climate change in the study area.

5. CONCLUSION
Smallholder farmers are more vulnerable to climate change because of their low adaptability capacity. They can adapt themselves to climate change by using adaptive methods. Use of these adaptation methods has a great deal to do with farmers' socioeconomic factors. among the socioeconomic factors influencing on adaptation of smallholder farmers, the age of the head of the family, the level of education, the experience of the farmer and the size of the family, size of Farm, farmer's capital, property ownership and household retention rate have the most relationship with the level of adaptation of farmers to climate change in the study area.
Concerning the findings of this study, the following points are recommending and suggest to increase the adaptation of smallholder farmers to climate change:
 Providing support services by the government and relevant organizations.
 Providing government subsidies for agricultural production to increase farmers' adaptability.
 Government investment in irrigation and water systems for large rivers such as Seymareh and Kashkan for water supply.
 Providing information to farmers on appropriate agricultural practices at different times.

Keywords


1. Aggarwal, P. K., & Singh, A. K. (2010). Implications of global climatic change on water and food security. In Global Change: Impacts on Water and Food Security (pp. 49-63). New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ‏
2. Alam, G. M., Alam, K., Mushtaq, S., & Clarke, M. L. (2017). Vulnerability to climatic change in riparian char and river-bank households in Bangladesh: Implication for policy, livelihoods and social development. Ecological Indicators, 72, 23-32. ‏
3. Bamlaku, A. (2011). The impact of poverty, tenure security and risk on sustainable and management strategies in north central Ethiopia: analysis across three agro-ecological zones. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 13(1), 227–240.
4. Bunce, M., Rosendo, S., & Brown, K. (2010). Perceptions of climate change, multiple stressors and livelihoods on marginal African coasts. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12(3), 407-440. ‏
5. Burton, I., Huq, S., Lim, B., Pilifosova, O., & Schipper, E. L. (2002). From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy. Climate policy, 2(2-3), 145-159. ‏
6. Connolly-Boutin, L., & Smit, B. (2016). Climate change, food security, and livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa. Regional Environmental Change, 16(2), 385-399. ‏
7. Crane, T. A., Roncoli, C., & Hoogenboom, G. (2011). Adaptation to climate change and climate variability: The importance of understanding agriculture as performance. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 57(3), 179-185. ‏
8. Deressa, T. T., Hassan, R. M., Ringler, C., Alemu, T., & Yesuf, M. (2009). Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Global environmental change, 19(2), 248-255. ‏
9. Devkota, R. P., Bajracharya, B., Maraseni, T. N., Cockfield, G., & Upadhyay, B. P. (2011). The perception of Nepal’s Tharu community in regard to climate change and its impacts on their livelihoods. International. Journal of Environmental Studies, 68 (6), 937–946.
10. Dube, T., Moyo, P., Ncube, M., & Nyathi, D. (2016). The impact of climate change on agro-ecological based livelihoods in Africa: A review. ‏ Journal of Sustainable Development, 9 (1), 256- 267.
11. Eriksen, S., Aldunce, P., Bahinipati, C. S., Martins, R. D. A., Molefe, J. I., Nhemachena, C., ... & Ulsrud, K. (2011). When not every response to climate change is a good one: Identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Climate and development, 3(1), 7-20. ‏
12. Feola, G., Lerner, A. M., Jain, M., Montefrio, M. J. F., & Nicholas, K. A. (2015). Researching farmer behaviour in climate change adaptation and sustainable agriculture: Lessons learned from five case studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 39, 74-84. ‏
13. Fisher, B., Naidoo, R., Guernier, J., Johnson, K., Mullins, D., Robinson, D., & Allison, E. H. (2017). Integrating fisheries and agricultural programs for food security. Agriculture & Food Security, 6(1), 1-7.‏
14. Garibaldi, L. A., Gemmill-Herren, B., D’Annolfo, R., Graeub, B. E., Cunningham, S. A., & Breeze, T. D. (2017). Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends in ecology & evolution, 32(1), 68-80. ‏
15. Gbetibouo, G. A. (2009). Understanding farmers' perceptions and adaptations to climate change and variability: The case of the Limpopo Basin, South Africa (Vol. 849). Intl Food Policy Res Institute, Washington, DC. ‏
16. Guodaar, L., Beni, A., & Benebere, P. (2017). Using a mixed-method approach to explore the spatiality of adaptation practices of tomato farmers to climate variability in the Offinso North District, Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1- 13. ‏
17. Kates, R. W., Travis, W. R., & Wilbanks, T. J. (2012). Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(19), 7156-7161. ‏
18. Kifle, S., Teferi, B., Kebedom, A., & Legesse, A. (2016). Factors influencing farmer's decision on the use of introduced soil and water conservation practices in the lowland’s of Wenago Woreda, Gedeo Zone, Ethiopia. American Journal of Rural Development, 4(1), 24-30. ‏
19. Kolawole, O. D., Motsholapheko, M. R., Ngwenya, B. N., Thakadu, O., Mmopelwa, G., & Kgathi, D. L. (2016). Climate Variability and Rural Livelihoods: How Households Perceive and Adapt to Climatic Shocks in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Weather, Climate, and Society, 8(2), 131-145. ‏
20. Lu, H., McComas, K. A., & Besley, J. C. (2017). Messages promoting genetic modification of crops in the context of climate change: Evidence for psychological reactance. Appetite, 108, 104-116. ‏
21. Maraseni, T. N. (2012). Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal. Environmental science & policy, 21, 24-34. ‏
22. Motiee Langroodi, S. H., Suri, F., & Cheraghi, M. (1395/2016). Analysis of the relationship between family farming systems and food security in rural areas rich District-Bigelow. Human geography research, 48 (1), 197- 209. [In Persian].
23. Mugi-Ngenga, E. W., Mucheru-Muna, M. W., Mugwe, J. N., Ngetich, F. K., Mairura, F. S., & Mugendi, D. N. (2016). Household's socio-economic factors influencing the level of adaptation to climate variability in the dry zones of Eastern Kenya. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 49-60. ‏
24. Nyanga, A., Kessler, A., & Tenge, A. (2016). Key socio-economic factors influencing sustainable land management investments in the West Usambara Highlands, Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 51, 260-266. ‏
25. Omoyo, N. N., Wakhungu, J., & Oteng’i, S. (2015). Effects of climate variability on maize yield in the arid and semi-arid lands of lower eastern Kenya. Agriculture & Food Security, 4(1), 1-8. ‏
26. Pricope, N. G., Husak, G., Lopez-Carr, D., Funk, C., & Michaelsen, J. (2013). The climate-population nexus in the East African Horn: Emerging degradation trends in rangeland and pastoral livelihood zones. Global environmental change, 23(6), 1525-1541. ‏
27. Raiten, D. J., & Aimone, A. M. (2017). The intersection of climate/environment, food, nutrition and health: crisis and opportunity. Current opinion in biotechnology, 44, 52-62. ‏
28. Shisanya, S., & Mafongoya, P. (2016). Adaptation to climate change and the impacts on household food security among rural farmers in uMzinyathi District of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Food Security, 8(3), 597-608. ‏
29. Smith, P., & Gregory, P. J. (2013). Climate change and sustainable food production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72(1), 21-28. ‏
30. Teshome, A., Graaff, J., Ritsema, C., & Kassie, M. (2016). Farmers' perceptions about the influence of land quality, land fragmentation and tenure systems on sustainable land management in the north western Ethiopian highlands. Land degradation & development, 27(4), 884-898. ‏
31. Vadivelu, A., & Kiran, B. R. (2013). Problems and prospects of agricultural marketing in India: An overview. International journal of agricultural and food science, 3(3), 108-118. ‏
32. Vente, J., Reed, M., Stringer, L., Valente, S., & Newig, J. (2016). How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. Ecology and Society, 21(2).‏
CAPTCHA Image