The Study of Environmental Effects of Reservoir Dams on Surrounding Rural Areas (Case Study: Karun-3 Dam in Izeh County)

Document Type : علمی

Authors

• Hojatollah Sadeghi ¹
• Seyyed Eskandar Saydaee ¹
• Mohammad Reza Rezvani ²

¹ University of Isfahan

² University of Tehran

10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.53097

Abstract

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Dams as one of the regional and national development infrastructures of each country have different effects on their surrounding regions such as rural areas. These impacts in various aspects and including environmental can be effective in sustainable rural development and its structural-functional framework. These impacts are two kinds. Rural settlements with regard to social and economic structures although in some cases accept positive effects of Dam construction, but their negative effects are not low. Karun-3 Dam in Izeh county as one of the largest reservoir dams in the country from dams is that due to the geographical features, have affected on Surrounding region especially rural areas. due to the current situation in rural areas, Identifying and explaining these effects is essential. The purpose of this research was investigate the environmental effects, Karun-3 Dam on surrounding rural areas.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The global organization emphasis on preserve life about natural conditions more than twenty river network of world, that negative effects of Dams construction on these rivers on environment is more of their creation benefits such as agricultural water supply and produce electricity. According to the organization, one of negative effects of Dams construction on some rivers is Waste in use of water in agriculture and the destruction of the natural environment, plant and animal species. In addition, large dams could have Geomorphic and hydrologic impacts on the ecosystem of region. In other words, studies show that dams have Great environmental impacts on vegetation, diversity and change in coastal ecosystems, human settlements and so on. This point is important, the emphasis on suitable management of and a stable with having systematic view. Therefore, proper management of the dam and surrounding regions, attention to sustainable development perspective and systematic view is from basic necessities.
3. METHODOLOGY
The research methodology based on the nature is descriptive-analytical and based on the purpose is, functional. Among the villages around the Karun-3 Dam were selected 38 villages, with due to Specific geographical properties. The statistical population was 2531 households and the sample using a Cochran formula calculated 334 households and Finally, to increase the reliability sample, the number was promoted to 350 households. The questioning in level of rural household was done. Finally, data after collecting using SPSS statistical software were integrated. In addition, from 38 rural local managers were interviewed and in the form of Grounded Theory, interviews organized and presented. Also on the section of opinions of experts, 100 experts in Izeh County were investigated.
4. DISCUSSION
Karun-3 Dam had much impacts in environmental instability on rural areas. For example, increasing climate change at the local level has led., Because the lake of Karun-3 Dam has been to increase parameters such as temperature and humidity in the region and in its result, in addition to direct effects, other consequences has entered on agricultural activities and the general economy. With climate change, Crops cultivation and so on be also experiencing problems that with lack of planning, this issue has been intensified and Agriculture in the region has been reduced. Also cultivable rural land tenure both in upstream and downstream has led to decrease in the agricultural sector. While this section should be developed due to the potential created, but because Rural the agricultural sector has been a downward trend. Of hazards, Dam created many earthquakes in the region. That as a result is the destruction and creation of multiple gaps in rural housings. In addition, rural land use has changed. Also vegetation covers and water resources in many cases has changed and the number of wells has decreased. Based on the findings of qualitative, two factor Increase of local temperature and increase of the hazards is known the most important environmental impact of the dam. Evaluation of environmental variables in rural areas upstream from expert opinion shows, the situation is not only not improved after the dam, but has worsened and this issue shows comparison of the mean scale in after dams Construction (49/2). In addition, the findings showed that at the household level, Karun-3 Dam affected in trend of less favorable environmental variables around villages the upstream and downstream. Amount evaluated variables equal significance level is (Sig = 000/0), it is confirmed. Also Independent sample t-test indicates to better environmental variables villages upstream to downstream with a significance level (Sig = 0/000).
5. CONCLUSION
Karun-3 Dam as a big reservoir Dam have been affected in decrease and trend of environmental variables of upstream and downstream villages. But this effectiveness has negative trend, not positive. Environmental variables in upstream rural areas. considering their average was better in before dam. By considering achieved average difference, is less situation upstream and downstream areas in after dam creation and Dam influence have more negative trend. Of course, we can say that this negative trend is the result of mismanagement. In general, the environment is affected by various human phenomena's including development projects. Using the results obtained can be in planning in the field be useful for decreasing the difficulties in rural areas.

Keywords

• environmental effects
• rural areas
• Karun-3 Dam
• Izeh county

---

References

1. Amini Qvaqlv, E. (1391/2012). Space reflections Khordad dam construction on the surrounding areas. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Kharazmi, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

2. Bani Said, N., Jafarzadeh, N., & Basim, N. (1382/2003). Environmental Impact Assessment Zalky Dam and Hydroelectric Power Plant. The Sixth National Conference of Environmental Health, University of Medical Sciences and Health Services Sari, Iran. [In Persian]

3. Beck, M., Claassen, A., & Hundt, P. (2012). Environmental and livelihood impacts of dams: common lessons across development gradients that challenge sustainability, International Journal of River Basin Management, 1)2).1-20.

4. Bombino, V., Tamburino, S. and Zimbone, M. (2006). Assessment of the effects of check-dams on riparian vegetation in the mediterranean environment: A methodological approach and example application. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 27(2).134-144.

5. Bryan, R., Aristides, P. and Jackson, B. (1975). Some ecological aspects of the Cabora Bassa dam. Journal of Biological Conservation, 8(3).189-201.

6. Campbell, B. (2013). BreakingGround: Environ-mental and Social Issues of the Three Gorges Dam in China,” TED Case Study. Retrived 15 December 2014 from http://www1.american.edu/ted/ICE/china-dam-impact.html

7. Company Development of Water Resources and Power of Iran. (1391/2012). Iran Water and Power Resources Development Company plans to introduce manual. Tehran: Company Development of Water Resources and Power of Iran of publication. [In Persian]

8. De Vos, J.A., Van, P.J.T., Hoving, E., & Conijn, J.G. (2006). Waterpas-model: A predictive tool for water management, agriculture, and environment. Journal of Agricultural Water Management, 86 (1, 2), 187-195.

9. http://fa.wikipedia.org/wikiکارون سه/ سد

10. Kates, R. W., Parris, T.M. and Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Journal of Environment, 47(3).8-21.

11. Meftahi, M. (1393/2014). The environmental impacts of the project area tourism Mamlou dam using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. The Eighth National Congress of World Environment Day, June 2014, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

12. Meisami, H., Mahajeri, H., Haghi, H., & Mousavi, P. (1385/2006). The role and the environmental impacts dam construction and water-tight. Paper presented in 1st National Conference of Environmental Engineering, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. Retrived 5 December 2014 from http://www.civilica.com/Paper-CEE01-CEE01_371.html. [In Persian]

13. Mikaniki, J., & sadeghi, H. (2013). Determining the pattern of rural service centers with land Suitability approach to AHP method. Research and rural planning of journal, 1(2). 49-67. [In Persian]

14. Organization of surveying (2014). Unit map (File GIS map of Iran), Tehran: Cartography organization. [In Persian]

15. Parvizi, A. (1393/2014). To determine effects caused in Yasouj Shah Qasem of dam the perspective of villagers. Unpublished master’s thesis, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. [In Persian]

16. Philip, m. (2001), Environmental impacts of Brazil's Tucurui Dam: Unlearned lessons for hydroelectric development in Amazonia. Journal of Environmental management, 27(3). 377-396.

17. Pirestani, M. r., & Shafaghi, M. (1388/2009). Environmental effects of dam construction. Human Geography Research Journal, 1(3). 39-50. [In Persian]

18. Rahmati, A. r. (1391/2012). Study assessment process the environmental impacts in Iran, Challenges and Solutions. Environment and Development Journal, 3(5) 15-23. [In Persian]

19. Rahmati, A., & Nazaryan, A. (1389/2010). Socio-economic and environmental effects of settlements subject to the relocation caused by dams (Case Study Gotvand Upper Karun River). Journal of Environmental Studies, 1(2), 53-66. [In Persian]

20. Rezvani, M.R. (1390/2011). Planning rural development in Iran. Tehran: Ghomes press. [In Persian]

21. Riahi Samani, M., Turabi Hafshejani, E., & Kabiri Samani, A. (1382/2003). Environmental impacts assessment dam construction and power plant on the Karun River in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. The National Conference of hydro power plants of the country, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

22. Sait Tahmicioglu, M., Anul, N., Ekmekci, F. and Durmus, N. (2007)."Positive and negative impact of dams on the environment". International Congress on River Basin Management, Turkey, Chapter 2, 759-769.

23. Statistical Center of Iran. (1390/2011). Population and Housing Census 2011. Tehran: Statistical Center of Iran. [In Persian]

24. Strzepek, M., Gary W., Richard S.J. and Rosegrant, W. (2008). The value of the high Aswan Dam to the Egyptian economy. Journal of Ecological Economics, 66(1), 117-126.

25. Surya, K., Sharma. K., Tyagi, P., Ashok, U. and Haque, M. (2008). Acta Tropica, Building small dams can decrease malaria: A comparative study from Sundargarh District, Orissa, 107(2), 174-178.

26. Toro, J., Requena, I. and Zamorana, M. (2009). Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: Critical analysis and proposals for improvement. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(4), 79- 86.

27. University Jihad of Tehran University. (1380/2001). Plan of studies the social, economic and natural basin upstream Karun3-Dam. Tehran: project organization and management by the Department of Tehran University. [In Persian]

28. Vahabzadeh, A. (1377/1998). Earth Care: A Strategy for Sustainable Living. Mashhad: University Jihad of Mashhad press. [In Persian]

29. William, G. (2006). Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Journal of Geomorphology, 79 (3), 336-360.