Evaluation of Variables Affecting People's Participation in Soil Pasture and Watershed Management Projects (Case Study: Kouskabad Watershed in Khorasan Razavi)

Document Type : علمی

Authors

1 Elmi-Karbordi

2 Universiti Putra Malaysia

3 Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
The degree of public participation in development programs is a major determinant of success or failure of the programs, but the factors which make people participate still remain unknown. Many studies have developed numerous and sometimes different views concerning the dimensions of participation. The present study is designed to analyze people's participation in soil and water resources management programs by using the framework of social exchange theory.
Regarding the importance of the watershed plans on one hand and extensive effects of these plans in the rural regions on the other hand, the main purpose of this descriptive – corrective survey is to identify and analyze the effect of watershed plans implemented in Kushk-Abad village in Khorasan Razavi province. The basic purpose of this study is to analyze the factors influencing rural people’s participation in National Resource Projects for Sustainable Management of Watershed Management Program (WMP) in Kardeh Dam Basin.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The framework of this study is based on social exchange theory. The central idea of social exchange theory is that the exchange of social and material resources is a fundamental form of human interaction. This theory basically asserts that people develop attitudes toward other people and things in the context of anticipated personal benefits and costs to be derived from contacting with them. Activities that generate net benefits will tend to be perceived positively, while those activities that generate net losses will tend to be perceived negatively. Social exchange theory poses that all human relations are formed by the use of a subjective cost-benefit analysis and the comparison of alternatives. For social exchange theorists, when the costs and benefits are equal in a relationship, then, that relationship is defined as equitable. The notion of equity is a core part of social exchange theory.
3. METHODOLOGY:
The statistical population includes head of households who dwell in Kardeh village and participated in this project. The statistical population of this study consisted of all the heads of households of Kushk-Abad village (N= 1250). Based on Kerjcie and Morgan Table, a sample of 200 person was selected using simple random sampling. Data were collected from face-to-face interviews with respondents based on a structured questionnaire. The main instrument of the survey was a questionnaire whose validity was established by an experts’ panel consisting of specialists in natural resources extension. It's reliability was established by calculating Coronbach’s alpha coefficient for measuring level of rural people’s participation in WMP. A pilot study was conducted to establish reliability of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used for the main scale of questionnaire, which scored more than 0.85, confirming its appropriate reliability. Collected data were analyzed using the SPSS win18 software.
4. DISCUSSION:
The findings of research showed that household size, times of traveling to town, level of participation in previous projects, awareness of plan goals, awareness of degradation impacts of natural resources, need to social solidarity, contact with technical experts, and visiting sample projects are positively and significantly (p

Keywords


1. Azkiya, M., & Ghaffari, R. (2001). An inquiry of the relationship between social trust and social participation in Kashan rural area, Journal of Nameh-ye Olume Ejtemai, (17), 3-31. [In Persian]
2. Bagdi, G. (2014). People participation in soil and water conservation through watershed approach. Indian International Book Distributing (IBDs), 2(3), 57-66.
3. Baghaie, M. (1385/2006). Methods of public participation in watershed plans (Case study: Zarcheshme Hodanjan). Unpublished master's thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran. [In Persian]
4. Bagherian, R., Bahaman, A., Asnarulkhadi, A., & Ahmad, S. S. (2009). Community participation in watershed management programs. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 251-256.
5. Bagherian, R., Goodarzi, M., & Shadfar, S. (2011). Relationship between attitude toward watershed management programs and level of participation. Journal of Scientific Research, 9(3), 324-329.
6. Blau, T., & Anderson, B. (2011). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley and Sons.
7. Dolisca, F., Douglas, R. C., Joshua, M. M., Daniel Weber, D., & Ashlil, S. (2006). Factors influencing farmers participation in forestry management programs: A case study from Haiti. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 23, 324-331.
8. Ebrahim Pour, M. (2000). Status of participation action and factors influencing it in watershed management. Collection of articles of First Convention of Natural Resources, Participation and Development. Tehran: Forests, Range and Watershed Management Organization of Iran.
9. Faham, E. (2008). Analysis of factors influencing rural people’s participation in national action plan for sustainable management of land and water resources in Hable-Rud basin, Iran. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 3(2), 457-461.
10. Georg, D. (2001). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and references (3th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11. Gilles, A. A. (1995). A social exchange approach to worker participation. Michigan State University, College of Social Sciences.
12. Guilford, J. P. (2005). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Hair, J. R., Anderson, J. F., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall International, Upper Saddle River.
14. Heinen, J. T. (1993). Park-people relations in Kosi Tappu wildlife reserve (Nepal: A socioeconomic analysis). Environ. Conserv., 20, 25-34.
15. Hernandez, E. (2000). Monitoring and evaluation of watershed management project achievements. FAO Conversation Guide, 24, 11-45.
16. Homan, G. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
17. Hunter, R. W. (1982). Administrative style and staff moral. The Journal of Education Administration. J. Edu. Admin., 20, 88-97.
18. ILbery, B.W. (1978). A behavioral analysis of hoop farming in ereford and Geoforum. 4:447-459,. 251-256.
19. Kaliba, A. (2004). The impact of adoption soil conservation practices on wheat yield in Lesotho.
20. Karimi, E., & Chizari, M. (2009). Farmers’ attitude toward soil conservation: A comparative study. Journal of Extension Systems, 11(1), 11-26.
21. Keyvanzadeh, M. (1389/2010). The role of people participation in watershed management program. Paper presented at the Fifth National Conference on Science and Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. [In Persian]
22. Krywkow, J., & Hare, M. (2008). Participatory process management. Paper presented at the International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software (EMSs),
23. Liuo, T., Larson, K., & Lach, D. (2010). Participants and non-participants of place-based groups: An assessment of attitudes and implications for public participation in water resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 817-830.
24. McDowell, C. (1989). The multivariate modeling and predication of farmers’ conservation behavior towards natural ecosystems. J. Environ. Management, 28, 185-210.
25. Mendoza, C. C. (2006). Factors influencing participation in environmental stewardship programs: A case study of the agricultural and forestry sectors in Louisiana. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisiana, America.
26. Mohammadi, B. G., Sadeghi, S. H. R., & Vahedi, A. (2015). Farmers’ attitude toward the soil conservation practices in the Kushk-Abad catchment basins in the province of Khorasan Razavi, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 5(2), 71-82.
27. Mohammadi, M., Sadoldin, A., Mahboobi, M., & Barani, H. (1389/2010). Analysis of the factors affecting farmers' participation in Chehel-Chai watershed management practices in the area in Golestan Province, Iran. Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Watershed Management Science and Engineering, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
28. Mohammadi, R., Gholamreza, D., & Ahmadi, F.Z. (1389/2010). Factors Influence on economic-social effectiveness of watershed and natural resources plans. Watershed Management Journal, 3(5): 400-406. [In Persian]
29. Nori, A., YarAli, N., Mafi, E., Gholami, D., Ahmadi, E., & Damavandi, A. (2009). Assessment of factors affecting the people participation in watershed management plans. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Water Resources Management, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran. [In Persian]
30. Nurick, A. J. (1982). Participation in organizational change: A longitudinal field study. Nurick, Aaron J., 35, 413-429.
31. Patrica, E. (2010). Public participation in watershed management: International practices for inclusiveness, physics and chemistry of the Earth, 8, 123-134.
32. Plaster, E. (2002). Soil science and management (2nd ed.). Delmar Publisher Inc.
33. Rasouliazar, S. (2014). Effective factors on rural people’s non-participation of Mahabad’s dam projects. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 4, 235-243.
34. Ravnberg, H., Westermann, O., & Pronst, K. (2001). User participation in watershed management in Asia, FARM Field, 7-18.
35. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417-2431.
36. Rezaie, R., Vadadi, E., & Mehrdoost, K. (2012). Assessment of effective factors on people participation in watershed management (Case study: Khomarak, Iran). Rural pajohesh Journal, 1(4), 199-221.
37. SCI (Statistic Center of Iran). (2015). Report of public population senses. Tehran: SCI Publication. [In Persian]
38. Searle, M. S. (1990). Social exchange theory as a framework for understanding ceasing participation in organized leisure activities. Acad. Manage. J., 23(3), 567-572.
39. Shaeri, A. M. (2010). Factors affecting participation of animal husbandry in animal control plan in north jungles. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Natural Resource, Participation and Development, Kerman, 52-67. [In Persian]
40. Shafiee, F., Rezvanfar, A., & Hohieni, M. (2008). An assessment on the farmers’ attitude on soil conservation program (Case study: Kharkhe and Dez dam of Iran). Iran-Watershed Management Science and Engineering Journal, 2(3), 3-10.
41. Shahroudi, A. A., & Chizari, M. (2008). Factors influencing farmers’ attitude toward participation in water user's association (A case study in Khorasan Razavi Province, Iran). J.Sci.Technol.Agric.Nat.Res.,11, 313-313.
42. Singh, S.L., Kharel, B.P., Joshi, M.D., & Mathema, P. (2004). Watershed management (Case study: Nepal). Review and assessment of watershed management strategies and approaches. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, 2004.
43. Soleimanpour, M. (1389/2010). Survey participation and sustainable development in the comprehensive management of natural resources. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference of Watershed Management Science and Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. [In Persian]
44. Taleb, M. (1389/2010). Lessons from the participatory rural in Iran. Journal of Rural Studies, 1(2), 27-48. [In Persian]
45. Teacher, T. (1997). Farmer participation in reforestation incentive programs in Costa Rica, Agro forest. System, 35(3), 269-289
46. Webler, T. (2001). Public participation in watershed management planning: Views on process from people in the Field. Human Ecology Journal, 3(6), 77-83.
47. Yaghobi, J., Shamsaye, E., & Khosravipoor, B. (2010, May). Evaluation of effective factors on people participation in Zanjanrood, Iran. Paper presented at the 5th National Watershed Management Conference, Gorgan, Iran.
CAPTCHA Image