Assessment the Level Sustainability of Rural Destinations to Achieve Rural Tourism Development with Destination Image Modifier (Case Study: Derak Dehestan- Shiraz County)

Document Type : علمی

Authors

• Majid Nematolahi
• Mohammad Najjarzadeh
• Hossein Balochi

Semnan University

10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.54460

Abstract

Extended abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Rural tourism can be defined as the ‘country experience’ which encompasses a wide range of attractions and activities that take place in agricultural or non-urban areas. Its essential characteristics include wide-open spaces, low levels of tourism development, and opportunities for visitors to directly experience agricultural and/or natural environments. In the recent years, aside from its positive economic and social influences in the rural areas, tourism has been strongly accorded as a resource for the renewal and sustainable development of these areas. In fact, rural tourism is considered as a means of sustainable Development and natural resources protection. On the other hand, rural destination image is connected to common representations of rurality in tourism and rural imaginaries.
In Iran, 30 percent of the population live in rural areas. The villages of Drak Dehestan in Fars province is one of the most important region in Iran that has the potential for tourism sustainable development. In this way, the purpose of this paper is assessing the economic, social and environmental sustainability with regard to destination image role as a modifier factor in villages of Derak Dehestan in Shiraz city.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Nowadays, tourism is considered as the most comprehensive service industry of the world that has acquired a special place in economic, cultural, social, and political realms. Worldwide changes in the aftermath of the Second World War regarding the prevalence of urbanization, large cities, urban environmental pollutions, and the increase of leisure time resulted in the expansion of rural tourism. In the following decades, tourism was considered as a tool for rural development. Scientists have tried, by means of different patterns, to promote the role of tourism in the rural development. Therefore, it is possible to organically combine the two streams of destination identity research in the examination of a rural destination's image structure. Moreover, to construct a destination identity that represents localized features and lifestyles and elicits a holistic image suitable for tourism promotion, it is necessary to understand the role of rurality in rural tourism.
3. METHODOLOGY
In this research, a descriptive-correlation method was used and in terms of purpose, it is an applied research. Data were analyzed with Structural Equation Modeling (LISREL) and Partial Least Squares method (PLS). According to Morgan table and stratified random sampling method, 385 tourists were selected. To collect data, questionnaire was used and its validity and reliability were examined by Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis). The levels of sustainability in the villages were done by selection of a number of important elements. Economic sustainability were measured by 5 items of the questionnaire including employment, living condition, earning money, migration of economic actors and land prices in the area. In order to investigate the social sustainability, a total of 4 items were applied; cultural exchange between people and tourists, tendency to addiction, public security and social links. Environmental sustainability indicator includes 5 items, i.e., air pollution, noise pollution, natural areas, the construction in pristine areas, traditional texture village of Qalat.
4. DISCUSSION
In this research, most important aspects of sustainability have considered. In these villages, there are a range of positive and negative impacts in terms of rural tourism development. Results show social sustainability has highest impact factor (0.33). After that economic sustainability (0.22) and environmental sustainability (0.15) have more impact factor in the way of rural tourism development in selected villages of Drake region. Economic and environmental sustainable levels are lower than mean and social level is higher than mean. Moreover, the destination image as a modifier variable has positive and significant effect on economic sustainability, but it has not effect on social sustainability in Derak Dehestan and there is not significant relation between them. The Destination image has adverse and significant relation on environmental sustainability.
5. CONCLUSION
The image destination can have important role for rural destination. There is a dynamic tension between tourists' imagination and tourism destinations. The tourists' consumption of and interaction with rural are dependent on offering rural areas that match tourists' expectations. This research show that destination image can impacts rural sustainability. It can be said the more we have positive image towards rural destination, the more we have sustainability.
Given the findings, some suggestions are also presented, i.e., consider the role of local authority in the development of tourism as an effective factor to participate locals and raise awareness of the benefits of rural tourism development. Like other studies, this study has limitations. Including limited access to some tourists and inappropriateness of fitness model. It is suggested for future studies to examine the personal and demographic factors on people's willingness to visit and consider its impact on tourism development.

Keywords

• Destination image
• rural tourism development
• economic sustainability
• Social sustainability
• Environmental sustainability

---

References

1. Asayesh, H. (1374/1995). Rural planning principles and methods. (1th Ed.). Tehran, Iran: Payam Nour University press. [In Persian]

2. Azar, A., Gholamzadeh, R., & Ghanavati, M. (1391/2012). Structural- Path modeling in management: Application software. (1th Ed.). Tehran, Iran: Neghahe Danesh press. [In Persian]

3. Beerli, A., & Martin, D. (2004). Factors influencing destination image. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3), 657– 681.

4. Bell, D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll. (P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney, Eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: Sage Publications :149–160.

5. Burr, S. (2002). Sustainable development and use of our natural resources for recreation and tourism: The ideal and the reality. In The Proceedings of the 2002 Idaho Governor’s Conference on Recreation and Tourism Nampa Civic Center.‏

6. Cai, L. A. (2002). Cooperative branding for rural destinations. Annals of tourism research, 29(3), 720-742.‏

7. Chaharbalesh, M. (1389/2010). The role of tourism in Iran rural development. Jamejam Newspaper, 20 February 2011, P. 10. In Persian]

8. Chen, P. J., & Kerstetter, D. L. (1999). International students' image of rural Pennsylvania as a travel destination. Journal of Travel Research, 37(3), 256–266.

9. Choi, S., Lehto, X. Y., & Morrison, A. M. (2007). Destination image representation on the web: Content analysis of Macau travel related websites. Tourism Management, 28(1), 118-129.‏

10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ, 20-26.‏

11. Consulting Engineers of DHV. (1371/1992). Guidelines for rural centre planning. (S. J. Mir, N. Oktaie, & M. Ganjian, Trans.). (1th Ed.). Tehran, Iran: Research & Rural Issues Center. [In Persian]

12. Cotter, B., & Hannan, K. (1999). Our community our future: a guide to Local Agenda 21. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.‏

13. Crompton, J. (1978). A system model of the tourist’s destination selection decision process with particular reference to the role of image and perception constraints. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilm International.‏

14. Dwivedi, M. (2009). Online destination image of India: A consumer based perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21 (2), 226–232.

15. Eby, D. W., Molnar, L. J., & Cai, L. A. (1999). Content preferences for in-vehicle tourist information systems: an emerging travel information source. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 6(3), 41-58.‏

16. Fleischer, A., & Pizam, A. (1997). Rural tourism in Israel. Tourism management, 18(6), 367-372.‏

17. Frost, W. (2006). Braveheart-edNed Kelly: Historic films, herit age tourism and destination image. Tourism Management, 27(2), 247–254.

18. Gartner, W. (1989). Tourism Image: Attribute Measurement of State Tourism Products Using Multidimensional Techniques. Journal of Travel Research, 28(2), 16–20.

19. Governor of Fars Province. (1395/2016). The last division political of Fars province. Retrieved 3 August 2016 from http://portal.farsp.ir/menu.aspx?id=3579. In Persian]

20. Govers, R., & Go, F. M. (2004). Projected destination image online: Website content analysis of pictures and text. Information Technology & Tourism, 7(2), 73-89.‏

21. Greaves, N., & Skinner, H. (2010). The importance of destination image analysis to UK rural tourism. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(4), 486-507.‏

22. Hair, J. F. Anderson, R. E. Tatham, R. L., & Black, W C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, fifth ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

23. Hall, D. (1998). The Auchincruive Declaration. Retrieved 22 December 1999 from http://www.sac. ac.uk /info/ external.

24. Heneghan, M. (2002). Structures and processes in rural tourism. Signposts to rural change, 72.‏

25. Iranian Statistics Center. (1390/2011). Population and housing census Fars Province. Tehran, Iran: SCI Publication. [In Persian]

26. Irshad, H. (2010). Rural tourism–an overview. Rural Development Division, Government of Alberta, Canada.‏

27. Jomeh Pour, M. (1389/2010). Introduction to rural development planning: Perspectives and methods. (2th Ed.). Tehran, Iran: SAMT press. [In Persian]

28. Kastenholz, E. (2010). ‘Cultural proximity’as a determinant of destination image. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 16(4), 313-322.‏

29. Khaki. Gh. (1378/1999). research methods with an approach to thesis writing. (1th Ed.). Tehran: Publication of Scientific Research Center. [In Persian]

30. Lane, B. (1994). What is rural tourism?. Journal of sustainable tourism, 2(1-2), 7-21.‏

31. Lee, A. A., & O'neil, L. J. (2004). Framework for sustainability: a conceptual model of a complex system. Vicksburg, Missippi, USA. Ecological Resources Branch, Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). Retrieved 26 September 2004 from http://www.epa.gov/gmpo/lmrsbc/pdf/pres3 MRBA framework.pdf.

32. Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: issues and practice, 26(3), 33-43.‏

33. Lin, Y. C., Pearson, T. E., & Cai, L. A. (2011). Food as a form of destination identity: A tourism destination brand perspective. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 11(1), 30-48.‏

34. Loureiro, S. M. C., & Gonzalez, F. J. M. (2008). The importance of quality, satisfaction, trust, and image in relation to rural tourist loyalty. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 25(2), 117-136.‏

35. Mahmoudi, B., Haghsetan, A., & Maleki, R. (2011). Investigation of obstacles and strategies of rural tourism development using SWOT matrix. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(2), 136-141.

36. Maleki Minbash Razghah, M., Balouchi, H., & Farsizadeh, H. (1384/2015). Study of destination image and satisfaction on visit intention of tourists. Planning and Tourism Development Journal, 4(12), 11- 33. [In Persian]

37. Nikolic, R, Stefanovich, V. Azemovich, N, (2012). Economic Valorization of Rural Tourism (Suva Planina – A Mountain in South –Eastern Serbia). Economics Management Information Technology, 1(2), 90.

38. Pedford, J. (1996). Seeing is believing: the role of living history in marketing local heritage. In T. Brewer (Ed.), The marketing of tradition (pp. 13-20). Enfield Lock: Hisarlink Press.

39. Radac, A.B., Csosz, I, Iulianamerce, I., Matias, C. C & Dobra, C. I. (2012). The benefits of rural tourism. In sustainable rural development. International Scientific Symposium, Timisoara, Romania, 14(4), 369-372.

40. Risitano, M. (2005), Il sistema locale d’offerta turistica, in CANTONE L. (2005), (Ed.), Strategie di sviluppo integrato dei territori. Il sistema locale dei Campi Flegrei, Il Mulino Editore, Bologna.

41. Sarmad. Z, & Bazargan. A. (1385/2006). Research methods in the behavioral sciences. (12 th Ed.). Tehran, Iran: Agah press. [In Persian]

42. Schutte, I. C. (2009). A strategic management plan for the sustainable development of geotourism in South Africa. Doctoral dissertation, North-West University.‏

43. Snieška, V., Barkauskienė, K., & Barkauskas, V. (2014). The impact of economic factors on the development of rural tourism: Lithuanian case. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 280-285.‏

44. Stepchenkova, S., & Morrison, A. M. (2008). Russia's destination image among American pleasure travelers: Revisiting Echtner and Ritchie. Tourism management, 29(3), 548-560.‏

45. Štetić, S., Šimičević, D., Stanić, S. (2011), The role of sustainable development in the management of rural tourism destinations, VI Međunarodni naučni skup Žagubica 2011. Belgrade, SERBIA.

46. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205.‏

47. Urry, J. (1992). The tourist gaze “revisited”. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(2), 172-186.‏

48. Wheeler, F., Frost, W., & Weiler, B. (2011). Destination brand identity, values, and community: A case study from rural Victoria, Australia. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(1), 13-26.‏

49. World Tourism Organization. (2004). Indicators of sustainable development for tourism destinations: a guidebook. Spain: World Tourism Organization (WTO).‏

50. Zhang, X. (2012). Research on the development strategies of rural tourism in Suzhou based on SWOT analysis. Energy Procedia, 16, 1295-1299.