Ecological Footprint Analysis of the Tourism in Rural Areas (Case study: Veshnaveh Village -Qom County)

Document Type : علمی

Authors

• Farhad Azizpour ¹
• Hadi Garagozlou ¹
• Shahaboddin Isalou ²

¹ University of Kharazmi

² Allameh-e-Tabatabaei university

10.22067/jrrp.v5i2.37372

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Tourism industry is known as one of the most thriving, attractive, job- creating and greatest industries in third millennium. The growth of this industry, despite its many positive economic advantages for hosting communities, has had some adverse consequences particularly on environmental aspects that have led to increased concerns among the experts and planners. As a consequent, various methods have been presented since the 1980s which aim to evaluate human activities on the environment. Ecological footprint analysis (EFA) is one of those important methods used for one decade in different fields. Hence, the purpose of the present research is to evaluate tourists’ activities on natural environment using ecological footprint index.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The concept of ecological footprint was first proposed in 1996 by Reese and Wackernage in British Colombia University. This idea refers to the value of productive land required for meeting consumption needs of population and absorption of all their wastes. In fact, the results of the application of ecological footprint analysis indicate where human beings impose pressure on natural resources. Methods used based on the framework of ecological footprint include combined (deductive) and inductive calculations. Combined method is based on national consumption data; hence, it is suitable for national ecological footprint calculations. In inductive method, consumption categorization is performed based on components division and it is mainly applied in regional analyses. This method is known as a concentrated (top – down) approach meaning that at first the value of performed activity is determined based on the population and then these energies are converted to the main land use; afterwards, they are converted to the universal area unit in order to provide comparison with other sectors, organizations, and regions.
Generally, inductive approach provides a more perfect picture of conflicts related to material production and it shows significant relationship between primary productions (agricultural and mineral production) and secondary productions (industrial production).
3. METHODOLOGY
The present study is an applied research and the methodology used for this purpose is descriptive- analytic. Statistical population of this study includes all tourists visited Veshnaveh village during 2012. According to statistics presented by village council and also touristic complexes, the number of tourists was estimated to be 100,000. Therefore, the size of sample (about 350 individuals) was calculated using Cochran formula. The method of footprint calculation is deductive (combined) including following stages:
1- Estimation of per capita consumption of main materials based on total data of the region under study and dividing the total value by the number of population;
2- Estimation of the land assigned to each individual for production of each item consumed through dividing the average annual consumption of each item on the average annual production or land yield.
3- Calculation of average of total ecological footprint for each individual through summing up all ecosystem regions assigned to each individual.
4- Calculation of ecological footprint for the population of each under planning region (N) is obtained through the average product of ecological footprint of each individual in population size (N x EF = Fp).
5- The data used for estimation of the land size required for providing each one include food, transportation, rubbish, water, electricity, and oil.
It must be noted that the main components investigated include electricity, water, transportation, food, and rubbish.
4. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION
Many studies have been conducted concerning ecological footprint in urban and rural studies field; however, the present study is distinguished from prior studies in that it investigates the effects of tourism activities on the environment and that the selected model enables us to evaluate from local scale to global scale.
In this study, the effects of tourists’ activities on such sectors as transportation, rubbish, electricity, water, and food were investigated in Veshnaveh village. The results indicate that the rate of ecological footprint of tourism in this village is equal to 10751762 hectares that is 180 times more than the area of this village (60 hectare).
This situation compared to the environmental capacity of village that is 657 global hectares indicates high rate. These figures are calculated according to the standards presented by global footprint network (GFN) in 2008 by which the environmental capacity of each individual was calculated as 1.08 hectare.
The practical solutions concerning the modification of consumption pattern are the development of public transportation for village visitors, public training concerning consumption methods and observing environmental health, gas delivery to the villages instead of oil and gasoline that are more pollutant than natural gas.

Keywords

• Ecological footprint
• environmental effects
• sustainable tourism
• Qom county
• Veshnaveh village

---

References

1. Alipour, S. Kh., & Eghbali, N. (1390/2011). The role of ecotourism attractions, cultural and historical tourism development in Semnan province. Journal of Tourism Space, 1(1), 61-41. [In Persian]

2. Badri, S.A., & Eftekhari, R. (1383/2004). Sustainability assessment: concepts and methods. Journal of Geographical Research, 18(69), 9-34. [In Persian]

3. Badri, S.A., Moteie Langroodi, S.A., Salmani, M., & Aligholizadeh Firuzjani, N. (1388/2009). Economic impact of tourism on rural areas. Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 7(12), 13-35. [In Persian]

4. Bagliani, M., Galli, A., Niccolucci, V., & Marchettini, N. (2008). Ecological footprint analysis applied to a sub-national area: the case of the Province of Siena (Italy). Journal of Environmental Management, 86(2), 354-364. ‏

5. Bell, S., & Morris, A. (1385/2006). Stability testing. (N. Shahnoushi., & Y. Azarif-far, Trans.). Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press. [In Persian]

6. El Hanandeh, A. (2013). Quantifying the carbon footprint of religious tourism: the case of Hajj. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52(1), 53-60. ‏

7. Esmail-Zadeh, H., Servers, R. (1390/2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of international conferences on the development of nature-based tourism. Journal of Tourism Space, 1(1), 115-141. [In Persian]

8. Ghadami, M. (1390/2011). Assessment and strategy formulation destination in the framework of sustainable development tourism (Case study: Mashhad metropolitan). Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 3(9), 82-59. [In Persian]

9. Gössling, S., Hansson, C. B., Hörstmeier, O., & Saggel, S. (2002). Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability. Journal of Ecological Economics, 43(2), 199-211. ‏

10. Hadley, S. W., Erickson III, D. J., Hernandez, J. L., & Thompson, S. L. (2004, July). Future US energy use for 2000-2025 as computed with temperatures from a global climate prediction model and energy demand model. In 24th United States Association of Energy Economists/International Association of Energy Economists North American Conference, Washington, DC. ‏

11. Holden, E. (2004). Ecological footprints and sustainable urban form. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(1), 91-109. ‏

12. Hunter, C., & Shaw, J. (2007). The ecological footprint as a key indicator of sustainable tourism. Tourism Management, 28(1), 46-57. ‏

13. Johnson, P. A. (2003). Exploring the ecological footprint of tourism in Ontorio. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Waterloo Ontario, Canada.

14. Ko, T. G. (2005). Development of a tourism sustainability assessment procedure: a conceptual approach. Tourism Management, 26(3), 431-445. ‏

15. Lenzen, M., & Murray, S. A. (2003). The ecological footprint–issues and trends. ISA Research Paper, 1, 1-3. ‏

16. Martin-Cejas, R. R., & Sanchez, P. P. R. (2010). Ecological footprint analysis of road transport related to tourism activity: The case for Lanzarote Island. Tourism Management, 31(1), 98-103. ‏

17. Mostafa, M. M., & Nataraajan, R. (2009). A neuro-computational intelligence analysis of the ecological footprint of nations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(9), 3516-3531. ‏

18. Neto, F. (2003). A new approach to sustainable tourism development: Moving beyond environmental protection. In Natural Resources Forum, 27(3), 212-222. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

19. Patterson, T. M., Niccolucci, V., & Bastianoni, S. (2007). Beyond “more is better”: ecological footprint accounting for tourism and consumption in Val di Merse, Italy. Ecological Economics, 62(3), 747-756. ‏

20. Peng, L., & Guihua, Y. (2007). Ecological footprint study on tourism itinerary products in Shangri-La, Yunnan Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(7), 2954-2963. ‏

21. Pigram, J. J., & Wahab, S. (2005). Sustainable tourism in a changing world. Tourism, Development and Growth: The Challenge of Sustainability, 17-32. ‏

22. Rezvani, M.R., Salmani, M., Ghanbari Nasab, A., & Baghiyani, H. (1389/2010). Ecological footprint, a new approach for the assessment of environmental impact (concept, function and its measurement). Journal of Geography and Development, 8(20), 145-166. [In Persian]

23. Ryan, B. (2004). Ecological footprint analysis: an Irish rural study. Irish Geography, 37(2), 223-235.

24. Saraei, M.H., & Zarei, F. (1388/2009). Ecological footprint (EF) as an indicator of social sustainability. Ecology Journal, 35(50), 15-26. [In Persian]

25. Shakour, A., Qureashi, M. B, Lashkari, M., & Jafari, M. (1390/2011). Assessing how sustainable tourism, in Behesht-e- gomshodeh bovan mamasani with Ecological Footprint Model. Journal of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 3(3), 57-67. [In Persian]

26. Taghavi, M., & Gholipour-e-Soleimani, A. (1388/2009). Factors affecting the growth of the tourism industry in Iran. Economic Journal, 9(3), 157-172. [In Persian]

27. Taghvai, M., & Safarabadi, A. (1390/2011). Urban management role in the sustainable development of urban tourism: A Case Study of Kermanshah. The Journal of Geography Studies of Arid Regions, 1(4), 35-52. [In Persian]

28. Tayebi, S.K., Babaki, A., & Jabbari, A. (1386/2007). Examining the relationship between tourism and economic growth in Iran. Humanities and Social Sciences for the Economy, 7(26), 83-110. [In Persian]

29. Venetoulis, J., & Talberth, J. (2008). Refining the ecological footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(4), 441-469. ‏