An Explanation of Resettlement in Rural Sustainable Development Using Grounded Theory Approach (Case Study: Resettlement in Flooded Villages in Golestan Province)

Document Type : علمی

Authors

• Amin Mohammadi Ostadkelayeh ¹
• Seyyed Hasan Motiee Langerudi ²
• Mohammad Reza Rezvani ²
• Mojtaba Ghadiri Masoom ²

¹ Gonbad University, Gonbad, Iran

² Universityof Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22067/jrrp.v5i1.47384

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
There has been a tremendous surge of interest in the issue of sustainability of resettlement plans; moreover, the economic, social, and environmental consequences of this issue have been frequently touched upon by rural planners and decision-makers. As evidence shows, lack of assessments and enough knowledge on the issue of resettlement has led to unsustainable resettlement plans. Under the grounded theory approach and with a qualitative method, the current case study attempts to answer this question that "how do the communities under study evaluate the effects of resettlement on sustainable development in their community?"
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Resettlement is a process that helps people mitigates the effects of displacement on their standard of living. A sustainable development approach uses resettlement as an opportunity to improve living standards of displaced people and ensure they benefit from the development activity. Resettlement planning allows the impacts of displacement to be mitigated and development opportunities to be created for those who have been affected. While adequate and early resettlement planning may increase the initial investment costs of an activity, long-term benefits include fewer delays and cost during project implementation, greater benefits from economically productive resettles, and reduced welfare costs to society. International experiences of voluntary and involuntary resettlement reveal that it is difficult to achieve success, particularly, when resettlement is carried out as part of development projects.
3. METHODOLOGY
The level of analysis in the present research include Faraghi, displaced villages of Qulaq Kasan, lower Boq Qeje, and upper Boq Qeje and local informants' unit of analysis. 32 subjects were selected through snowball sampling from among local informants. The interview with the subjects continued until theoretical saturation was reached. In the current research, the conceptual model was designed through systematic implementation of a five-stage grounded theory and combination of codes (open coding, axial coding, and selective coding).
4. DISCUSSION
Based on what has previously been said about the changes in several aspects of residents' lives in villages under resettlement scheme, it can be claimed that tremendous changes have been observed in the way the subjects lead their lives as a result of performing resettlement approach in the rural community of eastern Golestan. Therefore, based on what has been said, one can say that observations and investigations represent variations of "subjective-objective" changes in the region. Concerning economic issues in the livelihoods of the people living in rural areas, one can see a "transformation in occupational structure", i.e., extended service jobs and reduced number of jobs in the agricultural sector; "life style", that is tendency towards urban life and distance from rural life, "reduction in employment" and "loss of income and debt to the banking system" and especially extended usury and pre-sale of the agricultural products. Impossibility of livestock activities has made some individuals return to old rural places and also has led to "double settlement" of some individuals in order to utilize the facilities of the old place.
Regarding social issues, one can experience a "social change", such as lack of face-to-face communication, change in dimensions of social actions, change in social relations, transformation of social control tools, and relational changes. "Change of neighborhood", "transformation of family", and increase in nuclear families are some other relevant issues. Furthermore, resettlement results in "relative transformation of rural management pattern", that is development of formal and state organizations, "improved welfare", and "education".
Environmentally speaking, areas with resettlement plan have experienced "change of housing pattern" and "non-functionality due to production activities", "improved safety against flooding" through applying technical standards in the construction of new homes and staying away from flood-prone areas resulting in "ease of communication with the neighboring towns", and "expansion in the use of modern forms of communication", such as internet especially in the new city of Faraghi.
5. CONCLUSION
Although resettlement of rural people is necessary in critical times, it should be implemented according to the local conditions of people in addition to considering their economic, social, and environmental requirements of them in the form of suitable projects including replacement, integration, and regrouping of villages. The most important economic considerations in implementation of resettlement plans include employment, production, and communities with resettlement plan. Based on the findings of the current research, resettlement plans in flooded areas of Eastern Golestan do not correspond with sustainability pattern. No decrease in poverty, inequality, and no specific transformation in agriculture are proof of claim. Accordingly, the grounded theory of "resettlement with a physical non-integrated approach and mean sustainability" is presented for villages under resettlement plan for the area under study.

Keywords

• Golestan province
• resettlement Grounded Theory
• rural sustainable development flood

---

References

1. Abduljalal, S. (1388/2009). Accommodation management process after the flood (Case Study: flood of Golestan 2005). Unpublished master's thesis, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

2. Agba, A. M. Ogaboh., Akpanudoedehe, J. J., & Ushie, E. M. (2010). Socio-economic and cultural impacts of resettlement on Bakassi people of Cross River State, Nigeria. Studies in Sociology of Science 1(2), 50-62.

3. Ardalan, A., Holakouie Naieni, K., Mahmoodi, M., Zanganeh, A. M., Keshtkar, A. A., Honarvar, M. R., & Kabir, M. J. (2010). Flash flood preparedness in Golestan province of Iran: A community intervention trial. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 5(4), 197-214.

4. Ardeshiri, M. (1388/2009). The formulation of resettlement plans pattern in dam’s projects with emphasis on environmental consideration. Unpublished master's thesis, Tehran University, Tehran. [In Persian]

5. Badri, S.A. (1380/2001). Evaluating the sustainability of rural resettlement strategy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tarbiat Moddares University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

6. Badri, S.A., & Roknoddin Eftekhari, A. R. (1382/2003). Economic impact assessment of rural regrouping after earthquake from sustainable development viewpoint (Case study: Balkor and Jamalabad villages of Tarom-e-Olya County). Modares Journal, 7(2), 23-60. [In Persian]

7. Bahrainy, H., & Hajibandeh, M. (1390/2011). Urban-village model: An efficient approach to achieve sustainable rural settlements. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 30(134), 49-74. [In Persian]

8. Coffey, V., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2012, April). Rebuilding housing after a disaster: factors for failure. In Proceedings of 8th Annual International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure, Renewal and Reconstruction (IIIRR), (pp. 292-300). Kumamoto University, Japan.

9. EM-DAT. (2014). The OFDA/CRED international disaster database. Brussels-Belgium: University Catholique de Louvain.

10. Esmaeili, M., Salsali, M., & Cheraghi, M. (1392/2013). Quality in grounded theory studies. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 2(3), 287-296. [In Persian]

11. Fathi, S., & Motlagh. M. (1389/2010). Theoretical approach to the rural sustainable development according to information and communication technology (ICT). Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, 2(2), 47-66. [In Persian]

12. Firouznia, Gh., Mousakazemi, S. M., & Sadeghi Taheri, A. (1390/2011). Review the effect of merging village in to a city, Case study: villages merged in to Kashan city). Journal of Geography and Development, 9(25). 79-96. [In Persian]

13. Hajbagheri, A., & Salsali, M. (1382/2003). Approach and qualitative methods in rural development. Tehran: Ney Press. [In Persian]

14. Jalalian, H., Soleymangoli, R., & Tourani, A. (1392/2013). Reviewing the experiences of rural settlement planning for endangered villages with a look at Safi Abad resettlement plan in Minoodasht. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 2(2), 179-211. [In Persian]

15. Jha, A. K., & Duyne, J. E. (2010). Safer homes, stronger communities: a handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters. USA: World Bank Press. ‏

16. Keraminiyage, K., & Piyatadsananon, P. (2013). Achieving success in post-disaster resettlement programs through better coordination between spatial and socio-economic/cultural factors. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(3), 352-372.

17. Montazeriun, M. (1390/2011). A study of the rural settlements relocation process in reconstruction planning after the 2005 flood in the east of Golestan province, Unpublished master's thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]

18. Moshiri, F. (1390/2011). Human approach in resettlement planning in regional development plans. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 30(135), 85-104. [In Persian]

19. Oruonye, E. D. (2011). The socio-economic impact of the Lake Chad resettlement scheme, Nigeria. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5(3), 238-245.

20. Pahlavanzadeh, H., Rezvani, M. R., & Mohammadi, A. (1391/2012). Assessing the quality of life in post disaster rural resettlement (Case study: Regrouping villages in Golestan province). Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 31(137), 97-112. [In Persian]

21. Piyatadsananon, P. (2014). Application of spatial analysis in post-disaster resettlement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Salford, Salford, UK.

22. Pourtaheri, M., Badri, S. A‎., Asgary, A‎. ‎ & Eftekhari, A. R. (1390/2011). Strategies and policies for the physical development of rural settlements (With an emphasis on international experience and Iran). Tehran: Bonyad Maskan Press. [In Persian]

23. Rahmati, M. M. (1385/2006). Socio-economical changes of integration of rural areas after the earthquake in Rudbar and Manjil regions. Journal of Social Studies, 1(2), 83-110. [In Persian]

24. Rezvani, M., Kowkabi, L., & Mansourian, H. (1392/2013). The resettlement effects on the quality of life in the villages damaged by natural hazards (Case study: Zanjiran and Isar town in Fars province). Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 32(144), 87-106. [In Persian]

25. Sharifi, F., Samadi, S. Z., & Wilson, C. A. (2012). Causes and consequences of recent floods in the Golestan catchments and Caspian Sea regions of Iran. Natural hazards, 61(2), 533-550. ‏

26. Strauss, A., & Korbin, J. (1385/2006). Basic of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and techniques. (B. Mohammadi, Trans.). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]

27. Tavakoli, J. (1380/2001). An overview of the theory and practice of rural integrated. Journal of Jahad, 21(244-145), 43-49. [In Persian]