Investigating Barriers to Participation of Rural Women from the Perspective of the Community-Oriented Approach (Case Study: Rural Women of Lasht Nesha District)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Elnaz Asheri-Gafsheh ¹
• Ali Hajinejad ¹
• Khadije Sadeghi ²

¹ University of Guilan, Iran

² University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

10.22067/jrrp.v13i1.2311-1093

Abstract

Purpose-Women's participation in decision-making processes is a prerequisite for achieving sustainable development in local communities. However, despite the importance and necessity of involving all members of society in various aspects of development, unfortunately, due to various reasons (economic, social, cultural, and institutional), insufficient attention has been given to this matter. Consequently, the role of women's participation in rural development is significantly weak. Therefore, one crucial aspect of rural development planning is to focus on the participation of rural women and examine the obstacles they face.
Design/methodology/approach -This research is descriptive-analytical in terms of its practical purpose and methodology. The data collection tools consisted of questionnaires and interviews conducted with a sample of 378 women from the villages of Lasht Nesha district in Rasht city. Descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis were used to analyze the data.
Findings-The test results revealed that five categories of factors constitute the primary obstacles to rural women's participation in the villages of Lesht-nesha district. These categories include: the status of social capital, education, health, and social characteristics, explaining a variance value of 17.32% motivation, self-awareness, and cognitive characteristics, explaining a variance value of 16.83% financial and economic status and characteristics, explaining a variance of 12.43% beliefs, community customs, and cultural characteristics, explaining 8.86% of the variance; and justice, gender equality, and institutional-political characteristics, explaining 8.55% of the total variance.
Originality/value - Overall, the results indicate that the barriers related to the social capital status, education, health, and social characteristics are more relevant to the participation of rural women.

Keywords

• Women's participation
• Community-oriented
• Lasht Nesha
• Exploratory factor analysis

Main Subjects

• Rural Studies

---

References

1. Aghahi, H., Binaiyan, A. & Fatahi, S. (2017). Investigating individual and family barriers to women's participation in political and social affairs of the village (case study: Harsin County- Shirez district), Journal of Rural development strategies, 4(1), 21-39. [In Persian] https://rdsj.torbath.ac.ir/article_46738.html
2. Ajayi, R., Otuya, N. (2005). Women’s participation in self-help community development projects in Ndokwa agricultural zone of Delta State, Nigeria, Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal, 41 (2), 189- 209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi044
3. Atai, P., Aliabadi, V. & Azami, M. (2021). Investigating socio-economic factors affecting the participation of rural women in creating home businesses in Kermanshah Province, Agricultural Economy and Development, 35(3), 205-217. [In Persian] 22067/JEAD.2021.17745.0
4. Atmis, E., Özden, S., & Lise, W. (2007). Urbanization pressures on the natural forests in Turkey: An overview. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(2), 83-92.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.01.002
5. AusAID. (1997). Gender and Development: Australia‟s Aid Commitment. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from ausaid.gov.au/publications/pdf/genderanddevelopment_policy1999.pdf.
6. Boakye-Agyei, K. (2009). Fostering civic engagement: Stakeholder participation in rural projects in Ghana. George Mason University.‏
7. Botes, L., & Rensburg,V. D. (2000). Community participation in development: nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal, 35(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/35.1.41
8. Breuer, L. (2002). An EM algorithm for batch Markovian arrival processes and its comparison to a simpler estimation procedure. Annals of Operations Research, 112, 123-138.‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1020981005544
9. Chitthtalath, S. (2006). Community development projects and the status of ethnic minority women in the Moksuk-Tafa, Bokeo province, Laos. Community Development Journal. 42(3), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsl018
10. Djufry, F., Wulandari, S., & Villano, R. (2022). Climate smart agriculture implementation on coffee smallholders in Indonesia and strategy to accelerate. Land, 11(7), 1112.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071112
11. Faraji Sabokbar, H.A., Tahmasabi, B. & Salimi, F. (2021). Analysis of the challenges of women's participation in the management of rural areas (case study: Shemiranat small Lavasan district). Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Regions, 5(2), 51-69. [In Persian] Doi:10.52547/gsma.2.2.51.
12. Ghaffari, S.R. & Turki Harchgani, M. (2011). Investigating factors affecting the participation of women and girls in the development of rural areas of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province (case study: villages of Farsan district), Sociology Quarterly of Youth Studies, 2(3), 109-130. [In Persian] https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1058997/
13. Gyan, C., & Baffoe, M. (2014). Stress and coping strategies among bankers in the tema metropolis. Stress, 4(25).‏ https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document? 262856dfe2a8b60290e19
14. Gyan, C., & Ampomah, A. O. (2016). Effects of stakeholder conflicts on community development projects in Kenyase. Sage Open, 6(1), 2158244016635254.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016635254
15. Gyan, C. (2013). The effects of teenage pregnancy on the educational attainment of girls at Chorkor, a suburb of Accra. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(3), 53-60.‏ https://www.academia.edu/download/86486790/78b9762af510c22c2d867ac1ec2e55a6320b.pdf
16. Gyan, C. (2021). Community development participation scale: A development and validation study. Community Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.1885049.
17. Hajinejad, A. & Mozafari, Z. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of non-agricultural activities in the development of economic and social aspects of rural settlements (Case study: Firozeh Mines, Razavi Khorasan). Journal of Rural Planning and Research, 5(1), 135-123. DOI: 22067/JRRP.V5I1.45742
18. Hajinejad, A., Padayar, A. & Lotfi, H. (2014). Income analysis of rural households using the participatory evaluation approach (Narjuieh village, Jiroft city), Rural Research and Planning, 4(2), 157-171. https://jrrp.um.ac.ir/article_26215_f17994099b8f0b029f8def385e6f2e92.pdf
19. Mukta, L. N., Haque, M. E., Sadat, M. A., & Tareq, M. Z. (2020). Participation of Rural Women in Homestead Agricultural Activities (Doctoral dissertation, MS Thesis, Dept. Agril. Extn. and Rural Development, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur).
20. Mousavi, S.S., Omani, A.R. Allahiari, M.S. (2010). Investigating the obstacles of rural women's participation in agricultural production activities, cultural psychology of women (former women and culture), 2(5), 61-69. [In Persian] https://jwc.ahvaz.iau.ir/article_523463.htm
21. Nishi, N. Y., Islam, M. M., & Ahmed, M. B. (2019). Participation of rural women in organic farming. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 33(3), 1-14.‏ https://www.academia.edu/download/94501744/56617.pdf
22. Orapin, S. (1996) People’s participation in community development, TDRI Quarterly Review, 11 (3), 19–25.
23. Qanti, S. R., Peralta, A., & Zeng, D. (2022). Social norms and perceptions drive women’s participation in agricultural decisions in West Java, Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values, 39(2), 645-662. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10460-021-10277-z
24. Saidul Huq, Sh. M. (2016). Women’s Participation in Local Government: A Tool for sustainable development of Bangladesh, European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 4(11), 169 – 183. http://www.ejbss.com/recent.aspx-/
25. Sarkar, M., & Devi, A. (2014). Assessment of diversity, population structure and regeneration status of tree species in Hollongapar Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, Northeast India. Tropical plant research, 1(2), 26-36.‏ https://www.tropicalplantresearch.com/download/14/5.pdf
26. Tantoh, H. B., Simatele, M. D., & Ebhuoma, E. E. (2020). Shifting the paradigm in community-based water resource management in North-West Cameroon: a search for an alternative management approach. Community Development, 51(2), 172-191.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2019.1659382
27. Tulabinejad, M., Sepehvand, A. & Sohrabi, M. (2023). Analyzing the challenges of participation of rural women in Khorram Abad city in agricultural entrepreneurship activities, Women's Strategic Studies, 25(97), 199-224. [In Persian] 22095/JWSS.2023.375919.3131
28. UNHCR, (2008). Handbook for the Protection of Women and Girls. https://emergency.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/UNHCR%2C%20Handbook%20for%20the%20Protection%20of%20Women%20and%20Girls%2C%202008.pdf
29. Wulandari, S., & Villano, R. (2021, March). Strategies to optimize women’s participation in palm cattle integration. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 694, No. 1, p. 012014). IOP Publishing. Doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/694/1/012014
30. Woolcock, M. (2019). When do development projects enhance community well-being. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00031-z.