Analyzing the Effects of Rural Economy Diversification on the Livelihood Assets of Rural Households (Case Study: Khavmirabad District of Marivan County)
Purpose- In this applied study, which has been done by descriptive-analytical method, various agricultural and non-agricultural economic activities, and their impacts on the villagers’ livelihood assets are analyzed. Design/methodology/approach- Data collection was both theoretical using documentary method and empirical using interviews, observation, and distribution of questionnaires among 260 heads of households in the villages of the district. The sample size was determined by the Cochran method from a population size of 2736 households. The questionnaires were distributed among random heads of households as well as the sample villages that were selected by a stratified method. Findings- The analysis showed that the created economic diversity was able to increase the villagers’ livelihood capital, and among them, financial capital has had the greatest impact on improving the level of livelihood capital for the villagers. Research limitations/implications- Among the limitations of the study were the dispersion of a large number of villages in the border area, lack of easy access to these villages, lack of cooperation in providing information, and the villagers’ problem with completing questionnaires. Practical implications- The practical solutions of the study can be: prepare for the development and expansion of tourism (rural, commercial, and nature tourism), Making the necessary legal, administrative, and supportive bases for the development of entrepreneurship and domestic & foreign private sector investment (Iraqi Kurdistan region), Development of trade in goods from the border markets, and Support the formation of fundraising from the micro-savings in the villages for investment and launching production activities in the villages of the district. Originality/Value- Today, the predominant approach of rural planning to eliminate poverty as the most important obstacle to rural development is to provide sustainable livelihoods for villagers. In this regard, the main strategy of this approach is to diversify the rural economy and to bring about various agricultural and non-agricultural income resources in rural areas, so that the villagers’ assets will be increased and/or preserved, which is the core of the sustainable livelihood approach and the main factor of sustainable rural livelihood.
Chun, N., & Watanabe, M. (2011). Can Skill Diversification Improve Welfare in Rural Areas? Evidence from the Rural Skills Development Project in Bhutan(No. 260). ADB Economics Working Paper Series. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/109391
Belcher, B., Bastide, F., Castella, J. C., & Boissière, M. (2013). Development of a village-level livelihood monitoring tool: A case-study in Viengkham District, Lao PDR. International Forestry Review, 15(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554813805927174
Chandima, D. D. (2010). Gross National Happiness: A New Paradigm?‘Culture’: a new attribute to studying rural livelihood. In Third International Conference on Gross National Happiness, Bankok, Thailand(pp. 22-28). http:// citeseerx. ist. psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.729.7640
Christensen, I., & Pozarny, P. (2008). Socio-economic and livelihood analysis in investment planning. Roma: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Na-tions.
Dastvar, A. (2016). An analysis of the role of border markets on the sustainable livelihood of villagers in Khavmirabad District. Master Thesis in Geography and Rural Planning, Payame Noor University of Marivan, Iran. [In Persian] http://marivan.kd.pnu.ac.ir/ portal/home/
Ellis, F. (1999). Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: evidence and policy implications, the material that follows has been provided by the overseas development institute. file:///C:/Users/M/AppData/Local/Temp/odinrp40.pdf
Fang, P., Fan, J., Shen, M. Y., & Song, M. Q. (2014). Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China. Ecological indicators, 38, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.007
Javan, J., Alavizadeh, A. M., & Kermani, M. (2011).The role of diversification of economic activities in sustainable rural development of Semirom city. Geography Quarterly, 9 (29), 29-17. [In Persian] file:///C:/Users/M/AppData/Local/Temp/40813902902.pdf
Javan, J., & Makarri, H. (2011).The Role of Wells in Rural Economic Diversification (Case Study: Zahak County). Journal of Human Geography Research, 5 (76), 76-49. [In Persian] file:/// C:/ Users/ M/AppData/ Local/Temp/ 45813907604.pdf
Kaag, (2012). Ways forward in livelihood research. In Globalization and development(pp. 49-74). Springer, Dordrecht. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-2475-4_3
Karimi, K.,& Dehkordi, S. (2015). Rangeland Utilization and the Necessity of Diversifying the Livelihood of Rural Households (Case Study: Mahneshan County). Journal of Rural Research, 6 (2), 343-368. file:///C:/Users/M/AppData/Local/Temp/23013940206.pdf
Karimzadeh, H., & Velayati, Manafi Azar, R. (2015).The role of diversification of activities in the sustainability of rural economy (Case study: Merhamatabad Miyani village, Miandoab city). Journal of Spatial Planning, 6 (12) 141-129. [In Persian] http://gps.gu.ac.ir/article_33186.html
Lax, J., & Krug, J. (2013). LivelihoodAssessmentAparticipatorytoolfornaturalresource-dependentcommunities. (No. 7). Thünen working paper. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/87578
Manwa,, & Manwa, F. (2014). Poverty alleviation through pro-poor tourism: The role of Botswana forest reserves. Sustainability, 6(9), 5697-5713. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/9/5697
Mphande, F.A. (2016). Infectious Diseases and Rural Livelihood Systems in an Ecuadorian Agro socio ecosystem. WORKSHOP 2,the Sustainability of Small-Scale Farming, 195-201. https:// www. springer. com/gp/book/9789811004261
Nakiyimba, D. (2014). Poverty reduction and sustainability of rural livelihoods through microfinance institutions: A case of BRAC Microfinance, Kakondo sub-county Rakai district Uganda. Bachelor’s Thesis School of social studies, Växjö Peace and development studies III.
Sadeka,, Reza, M. I. H., Mohammadand, M. S., & Sarkar, M. S. K. (2013). Livelihood vulnerability due to disaster: strategies for building disaster resilient livelihood. In Second International Conference on Agricultural, Environment and Biological Sciences, Pattaya, Thailand(pp. 17-18). http://ces.presidency.ac.bd/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/DRR_livelihood-Vulnerability_Sumaiya-et-al.2013.pdf
Sarrafi, M., & Shamsaii, M. (2010). Sustainable Livelihood Framework: A Strategy for Survival and Family Promotion in Informal Settlements (Case: Islamabad neighborhood in Tehran). Sofah Quarterly, 5 (65), 91-79. [In Persian] https://www.sid.ir/fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=290856
Shahraki, M., & Sharifzadeh, M. (2014).Assessing the status of aquaculture in sustainable livelihoods of farmers in Zahedan. Journal of Rural Research, 6 (1), 116-97. [In Persian] https://jrur.ut.ac.ir/article_54233.html
Sojasi Gheidari, H., Sadeghloo, I.,& Shakoori Fard, A. (1394).Assessing the level of livelihood assets in rural areas with a sustainable livelihood approach (Case study: villages of Taybad county). Journal of Rural Research and Planning, 4 (1), 211-197. [In Persian] https://jrrp.um.ac.ir/article_25705.html
Solesbury, W. (2003).Sustainable livelihoods: A case study of the evolution of DFID policy. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Tanner, T., Lewis, D., Wrathall, D., Bronen, R., Cradock-Henry, N., Huq, S., ... & Thomalla, F. (2015). Livelihood resilience in the face of climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5(1), 23-26. https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2431
Tayyabnia, S.H.,& Baradaran, S. (2014). A Study of Factors Affecting the Diversification of Economic Activities in Border Villages of Marivan County. Quarterly Journal of Law Enforcement, Kurdistan Province, 4 (19), 18-1. [In Persian] http://kurdestan.jrl.police.ir/article_16722.html
Van Kien, V. (2011). Social capital, livelihood diversification and household resilience to annual flood events in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta. EEPSEA research report series/IDRC. Regional Office for Southeast and East Asia, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia; no. 2011-RR10. http://hdl.handle.net/10625/48825
Warren, P. (2002). Livelihoods Diversification and Enterprise Development, food and agriculture organization of the united nation' livelihood Support Programme (LSP) An inter-departmental programme for Improving support for enhancing livelihoods of the rural poor. http:// www.fao.org/ 3/j2816e/ j2816e00.htm
Mohammadi, S. , Rostami, K. , & Karimian, T. (2021). Analyzing the Effects of Rural Economy Diversification on the Livelihood Assets of Rural Households (Case Study: Khavmirabad District of Marivan County). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 10(2), 79-97. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I2.78216
MLA
Saadi Mohammadi; Khadijah Rostami; Teymor Karimian. "Analyzing the Effects of Rural Economy Diversification on the Livelihood Assets of Rural Households (Case Study: Khavmirabad District of Marivan County)", Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 10, 2, 2021, 79-97. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I2.78216
HARVARD
Mohammadi, S., Rostami, K., Karimian, T. (2021). 'Analyzing the Effects of Rural Economy Diversification on the Livelihood Assets of Rural Households (Case Study: Khavmirabad District of Marivan County)', Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 10(2), pp. 79-97. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I2.78216
CHICAGO
S. Mohammadi , K. Rostami and T. Karimian, "Analyzing the Effects of Rural Economy Diversification on the Livelihood Assets of Rural Households (Case Study: Khavmirabad District of Marivan County)," Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 10 2 (2021): 79-97, doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I2.78216
VANCOUVER
Mohammadi, S., Rostami, K., Karimian, T. Analyzing the Effects of Rural Economy Diversification on the Livelihood Assets of Rural Households (Case Study: Khavmirabad District of Marivan County). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 2021; 10(2): 79-97. doi: 10.22067/JRRP.V10I2.78216
Send comment about this article