Journal of Research and Rural Planning

Journal of Research and Rural Planning

Social Life Cycle Assessment of Rice Production: A Systematic Review and Implications for Sustainable Rural Development

Document Type : Review Articles

Authors
1 University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract
Purpose- Rice production plays a fundamental role in ensuring food security and sustaining rural livelihoods worldwide. Despite its economic importance, rice production systems are often associated with social challenges such as inadequate working conditions, income inequality, and occupational health risks.
Design/methodology/approach- This study systematically reviews the application of Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) in rice production systems with a focus on its contribution to sustainable rural social development. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA protocol. Relevant studies were retrieved from international scientific databases, and after screening, the selected studies were analyzed based on stakeholder groups, social indicators, assessment approaches, and reported social impacts.
Finding- The resuls reveal that occupational health and safety, fair wages, labor rights, and the well-being of farmers are the most frequently assessed social issues. Organic and socially oriented production systems generally demonstrate better social performance than conventional systems. However, concerns such as child labor, labor exploitation, and unequal access to economic opportunities remain evident. Most existing studies focus primarily on workers and farmers, while broader dimensions of rural social development, including social resilience and community participation, receive considerably less attention. The limited number of available studies and methodological heterogeneity highlight the need for greater standardization in future S-LCA research.
Originality/value- The results emphasize the importance of incorporating social dimensions into agricultural policies and demonstrate the potential of S-LCA as a decision-support tool for promoting socially sustainable rice production systems. This study provides an integrated synthesis of S-LCA applications in rice production and explicitly links social life cycle assessment outcomes to sustainable rural social development.
Keywords
Subjects

1. Akinsemolu, A.A. and Onyeaka, H. (2025) ‘The role of green education in achieving the sustainable development goals: A review’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 210, 115239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115239
2. Asheri-Gafsheh, E. and Yasouri, M. (2025). Explaining the Effects of Rural - Urban Linkages on Changing the Rural Lifestyle (Case Study: Lasht-e Nesha District, Guilan, Iran). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 13(4), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v13i4.2408-1106 .
3. Asheri-Gafsheh, E. , Hajinejad, A. and Sadeghi, K. (2024). Investigating Barriers to Participation of Rural Women from the Perspective of the Community-Oriented Approach (Case Study: Rural Women of Lasht Nesha District). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 13(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v13i1.2311-1093
4. Benoît-Norris, C., Vickery-Niederman, G., Valdivia, S., Franze, J., Traverso, M., Ciroth, A. and Mazijn, B. (2011) ‘Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(7), pp. 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0301
5. Dehban Nejadian, A. , Ghanbari, Y. and Barghi, H. (2023). Assessing and Measuring the Sustainability of Rural Settlements Active in the Field of Medicinal Plants (Case Study- Kohgiluyeh & Boyerahmad Province). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 12(2), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v12i2.2212-1063 .
6. Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S. and Brown, C. (2011) ‘The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability’, Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417
7. Dreyer, L.C., Hauschild, M.Z. and Schierbeck, J. (2010) ‘A framework for social life cycle impact assessment’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.08.223 
8. Eghbali, M., Motavi, S., Janbaz Ghobadi, G., & Gholami, S. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Social Dimensions of Urban Resilience on Sustainable Tourism Development: Case Study of Mahmudabad City. Journal of Urban Tourism, 8(3), 1–16. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/JUT.2021.325464.913
9. FAO (2024) FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
10. Garfí, M., Requejo-Castro, D. and Villanueva, C.M. (2025) ‘Social life cycle assessment of drinking water: Tap water, bottled mineral water and tap water treated with domestic filters’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 112, 107815. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.08.223
11. ILO (2008) ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
12. Jørgensen, A., Le Bocq, A., Nazarkina, L. and Hauschild, M. (2008) ‘Methodologies for social life cycle assessment’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107815
13. Kalvani, S.R., Sharaai, A.H., Masri, M.F., Yunus, N.F.M., Afendi, M.R. and Uchechukwu, O.B. (2022) ‘Social impact and social performance of paddy rice production in Iran and Malaysia’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27(8), 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02083-4
14. Littig, B. and Griessler, E. (2005) ‘Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory’, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1–2), pp. 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007375
15.  Mancini, L., Valente, A., Vignola, G.B., Mengual, E.S. and Sala, S. (2023) ‘Social footprint of European food production and consumption’, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.005
16. McKenzie, S. (2004) Social Sustainability: Towards Some Definitions. Adelaide: Hawke Research Institute, University of South Australia.
17. Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.H. and Broman, G. (2017) ‘A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 1: Exploring the social system’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170
18. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S. and Mohtasebi, S.S. (2019) ‘Integration of fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm for cost–time–quality management in modern rice milling units of Rasht County’, Iranian Biosystems Engineering Journal, 50(4), 927–938.[In Persian] https://ijbse.ut.ac.ir/article_72439.html
19. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E. and Moher, D. (2021) ‘The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews’, BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
20. Parent, J., Cucuzzella, C. and Revéret, J.P. (2010) ‘Impact assessment in S-LCA: Sorting the S-LCA methods according to their outcomes’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(2), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0146-9
21. Petti, L., Serreli, M. and Di Cesare, S. (2018) ‘Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(3), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1135-4
22. Phantha, C., Prasara-A, J., Boonkum, P. and Gheewala, S.H. (2021) ‘Social sustainability of conventional and organic rice farming in north-eastern Thailand’, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 20(1), pp. 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2021.120433
23. Prasara-A, J. and Gheewala, S.H. (2025) ‘Enhancing sustainable development of the first ASEAN bio-hub using social life cycle assessment approach’, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 27(1), pp. 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02919-7
24. Sachs, I. (1999) Social Sustainability and Whole Development: Exploring the Dimensions of Sustainable Development. London: Zed Books.
25. Salahi Esfahani, G. (2018). Agricultural Tourism with an Emphasis on Sustainable Rural Development: A Case Study of Pomegranate Village of Qardin, Saveh. Tourism Space Quarterly, 7(27), 87–97. [In Persian] https://sid.ir/paper/513449/fa
26. Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Sharaai, A.H., Masri, M.F. and Kalvani, S.R. (2022) ‘The social impact study through the life cycle of rice production at Selangor, Malaysia’, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 97, 517–522. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2297087
28. UNEP (2020) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations 2020. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
29. UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Paris: United Nations Environment Programme and Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.
30. Vallance, S., Perkins, H.C. and Dixon, J.E. (2011) ‘What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts’, Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
31. Vinci, G., Ruggieri, R., Ruggeri, M. and Prencipe, S.A. (2023) ‘Rice production chain: Environmental and social impact assessment—A review’, Agriculture, 13(2), 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040535
32. WCED (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Wei, J., Cui, J., Xu,Y., Li, J., Lei, X., Gao, W. and Chen, Y. (2022) ‘Social life cycle assessment of major staple grain crops in China’, Agriculture, 12(4), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040535
34. Zarauz, I., Sanz-Hernández, A. and Rivera-Lirio, J.M. (2025) ‘Social sustainability in a good bioeconomy paradigm: A systematic review of social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 486, 144570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144570
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 14 June 2026
  • Revise Date 16 August 2026
  • Accept Date 03 September 2026