Identification and Assessing Economic and Social Services of the Natural Ecosystems to Rural Communities

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 University of Guilan, Sowmeh Sara, Guilan, Iran.

2 Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

3 Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.

10.22067/jrrp.v14i2.2411-1114

Abstract

Purpose- Protected areas (PA) are effectively managed places dedicated to the long-term conservation of biodiversity and natural values ​​with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. Forest and rengland ecosystems of national park provide a wide range of environmental, economic, and social services to human communities, with a variety of stakeholders. One of the beneficiaries of forest ecosystem services is the rural communities on the edge of forests. The proper and appropriate use of natural resources plays an important role in empowering local communities and affects their socio-economic status.
Design/methodology/approach- In this research, forest and rangeland ecosystem of the Kiasar National Park (KNP) was selected in Iran for assessing the social and economic natural ecosystems services to rural communities. For achieving the research goal, the Delphi questionnaire inclouding a set of indicators for natural ecosystems assessing extracted from various sources is used to identify the indicators of economic, and social services, Entropy and TOPSIS techniques to calculate their weight and prioritize, respectively. Also, GIS has been used to map the economic and social services of the natural ecosystems of KNP. In this study, 36 specialists in the field of national parks answered the Delphi questionnaire.
Findings- In this research exteracted 38 indicators including 20 social indicators and 18 economic indicators that among them, 7 economic indicators and 11 social indicators accepted and customized to assess the social and economical services of natural ecosystems. Then preparation capability map (Potential map) in four classes based on their weight and priority overplayed. The results indicated that recreational value, and interests and contributions from to rural communities protect and develop the park indicators had the highest priority in assessing the economic and social services of natural ecosystems. The KNP capability map showed that 1810.50 and 34.30 ha of the park is located in the very suitable class from an economic and social perspectives for utilization rural communities of services natural ecosystems park respectively. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Abdollahpour, J., Akbari, H., Valipour, A., & Lotfalian, M. (2020). The role of forest products in the livelihoods of the local communities of North Zagros (Case study: Kurdistan and West Azarbaijan provinces). Ecology of Iranian Forest, 7(14), 90–100. )In Persian(. http://ifej.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-280-fa.html
  2. Aguilar, F. X., & Wen, Y. (2021). Socio-economic and ecological impacts of China's forest sector policies. Forest Policy and Economics, 127, 102454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102454
  3. Ai, W. N., Wen, Y., Marin, K., Thapa, S., & Tun, A. W. (2019). Contribution of mangrove forest to the livelihood of local communities in Ayeyarwaddy region, Myanmar. Forests, 10(5), 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050414
  4. Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N. J., Bauch, S., Börner, J., Smith-Hall C., & Wunder, S. (2014). Environmental income and rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis. World Development, 64, S12–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006
  5. Bakkegaard, R. K., Hogarth, N. J., Bong, I. W., Bosselmann, A. S., & Wunder, S. (2017). Measuring forest and wild product contributions to household welfare: Testing a scalable household survey instrument in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 84, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.11.005
  6. Brandt, J.S., & Buckley, R.C. (2018). A global systematic review of empirical evidence of ecotourism impacts on forests in biodiversity hotspots. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.06.003
  7. Chan, K.M., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., &Halpern, B.S. (2012). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience, 62(8), 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
  8. Chen, X., & Wu, C. (2025). Mapping and Assessing the Supply and Demand of Rural Recreation Services in National Parks: A Case Study of Qianjiangyuan, Zhejiang, China. Land, 14(2), 302.‏ https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/302
  9. Chinnasamy, P., & Sunde, M.G. (2016). Improving spatiotemporal groundwater estimates after natural disasters using remotely sensed data – a case study of the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Earth Science Informatics, 9, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-015-0247-2
  10. Choi, H. C., & Sirakaya, E. (2006). Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism. Tourism management, 27(6), 1274-1289.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.05.018
  11. CIFOR. (1999). The CIFOR criteria and indicators generic template. Toolbox series, 2, 32 p.
  12. Codato, D., Pappalardo, S., & Marchi, M. (2017). Participatory GIS in Mapping Ecosystem Services: Two Case Studies from High-Biodiversity Regions in Italy and Peru. GI_Forum, 1, 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2017_02_s78
  13. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
  14. De Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
  15. Fisher, M. (2004). Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi. Environment and Development Economics, 9(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X03001219
  16. Ghahari, G. R., Soleimanpour, S. M., Salehpour Jam, A., Noroozi, A. A., & Nekooeian, G. A. (2021). Prioritizing affecting factors on Barriers Sustainable non-participation of rural communities
    in aquifer management projects from a beneficiary's perspective in Bishezard Watershed of
    Fars Province. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 12(23), 202–211. )In Persian(. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.12.23.202
  17. Gu, S. (2023). The impact of increasing forest loss areas on the global temperature, and tourism industry. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 9(3), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajraf/2023/v9i3241
  18. Hadadnia, S., & Danehkar, A. (2012). Prioritization of nature tourism criteria in desert and semi-desert ecosystems by Delphi method. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 5(3), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP11.126
  19. Hai, L.T., Hai, P.H., Khoa, N.T., & Hens, L. (2009). Indicators for sustainable development in the Quang Tri Province, Vietnam. Journal of Human Ecology, 27(3), 121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2009.11906145
  20. Hosseini, S., Amirnejad H., & Azadi, H. (2024). Impacts of Hyrcanian Forest ecosystem loss: the case of Northern Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-03256-6
  21. Hosseini, S., Oladi, J., & Amirnejad, H. (2021). The evaluation of environmental, economic and social services of national parks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(6), 9052–9075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01039-7
  22. Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In Multiple Attribute Decision Making (pp. 58–191). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
  23. IUCN. (1994). Guidelines for protected areas management categories, IUCN, Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland. 261 p.
  24. Jagger, P., Zavaleto Cheek, J., Miller, D., Ryan, C., Shyamsundar, P. & Sills, E. (2022). The role of forests and trees in poverty dynamics. Forest Policy and Economics, 140, 102750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102750
  25. Järv, H., Ward, R.D., Raet, J., Sepp, K. (2021). Socio-economic effects of national park governance and management: Lessons from post-socialist Era Estonia. Land, 10, 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121257
  26. Kalogiannidis, S., Kalfas, D., Loizou, E., & Chatzitheodoridis, F. (2022). Forestry bioeconomy contribution on socioeconomic development: Evidence from Greece. Land, 11(12), 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122139
  27. Krzanowski, Kułaga S., Basista I., & Borowski Ł. (2024). GIS tools in the conservation and sustainable development of national parks, forests and rural areas. International Journal of Conservation Science, 15(1), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.36868/IJCS.2024.01.11
  28. Lacayoa, , Rodilaab, Denisa., Giulianiab, G., & Lehmannac, A. (2021). A framework for ecosystem service assessment using GIS interoperability standards. Computers & Geosciences, 154, 104821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104821
  29. Li, Y., Mei, B., & Linhares-Juvenal, T. (2019). The economic contribution of the world's forest sector. Forest Policy and Economics, 100, 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.004
  30. Ludwig, L., & Starr, S. (2005). Library as place: Results of a Delphi study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(3), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.93.3.015
  31. Mahmoudi, B. (2022). Livelihood dependence analysis of local Bakhtiari communities on the forest resources of central Zagros. Nomadic Territory Planning Studies, 1(2), 39–48. )In Persian(. https://www.jsnap.ir/article_148509.html
  32. Mahmoudi, B., & Danehkar, A. (2002). Evaluation of recreational capacity for forest park planning in the forests of Lordegan city. Third National Conference on Green Space and Urban Landscape, 284-291. [In Persian]. https://www.sid.ir/FA/JOURNAL/Supporting.aspx?ID=162771
  33. Malekmirzaei, M., Karimain, A., Hakimi, M. (2017). The role of forests and rangelands sub-products on rural livelihoods: A case study of Zarrin Abad district of Dehloran county, Ilam province of Iran. Journal of Village & Development, 20(4), 17–28. [In Persian]. http://rvt.agri-peri.ac.ir/article_61314.html
  34. Mäntymaa, E., Tyrväinen, L., Juutinen, A., Kurttila, M. 2021. Importance of forest landscape quality for companies operating in nature tourism areas. Land Use Policy, 107: 104095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104095
  35. Masoudi, M., Centeri, C., Jakab, G. et al. (2021). GIS-Based Multi-Criteria and Multi-Objective Evaluation for Sustainable Land-Use Planning (Case Study: Qaleh Ganj County, Iran). International Journal of Environmental Research, 15, 457–474. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-021-00326-0
  36. Mitchell, E. (2010). Criteria and indicators of sustainable rangeland management.  Cooperative Extension Service Publication SM-56. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming. 227 p.
  37. Mohammadian, F., Yazdani, S., & Fehresti-Sani, M. (2021). The Role of Diversity in Improving Environmental Indicators: A Case Study in Mahidasht Plain, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research, 15, 19–32. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-020-00288-9
  38. Momeni, M., Sarafi, M., & Ghasemi Khozani, M. (2006). The structure and function of religious-cultural tourism and the need for integrated management in the metropolis of Mashhad. Geography and development, 6(11), 13-38. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2008.1255
  39. Mosaffaie, J., & Salehpour Jam, A. (2020). Identification and Prioritization of Effective Factors On
    Preventing Participation of Rural Societies in Watershed Management Plans Case Study (Niarij
    Watershed of Qazvin Province). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 11(22), 121-131.
    [In Persian]. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.11.22.121
  40. Najmizadeh, S., & Yavari, A. (2005). Assessing the environmental potential of Khabar National Park for zoning and planning with the help of GIS. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 38, 58-47. [In Persian]. https://jes.ut.ac.ir/article_12334.html
  41. Nemec, K., & Raudsepp-Hearne, C. (2013). The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z
  42. Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
  43. Pribadi, H., Malik, A., Golar, G., Dg, S., Massiri, M., Rahman, A., & Maiwa, A. (2023). Community
    attitude and behavior toward village forest management plan in central Sulawesi, Indonesia.
    Journal Ilmu Kehutanan, 17(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v17i1.3839
  44. Raihan, A. (2023). The dynamic nexus between economic growth, renewable energy use, urbanization, industrialization, tourism, agricultural productivity, forest area, and carbon dioxide emissions in the Philippines. Energy Nexus, 9, 100-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100180
  45. Reid, W.V., Mooney, H.A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., & Hassan, R. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Island Press.
  46. Report on the detailed plan of Kiasar national park. (2012). Studies and preparation of the detailed plan of Kiasar National Park in Mazandaran province. Environmental Protection Organization, 115 p. [In Persian].
  47. Rocchinia, , Vaclav P., Petrasova, A., & et al. (2017). Spatio-ecological complexity measures in GRASS GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 104, 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.06.015
  48. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D., Larrubia, R., Sinoga, J.D. (2021). Are Protected Areas Good for the Human Species? Effects of Protected Areas on Rural Depopulation in Spain. Science of the Total Environment. 763, 144399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144399
  49. Roux, D.J., Smith, M.K.S., Smit, I.P.J., Freitag, S., Slabbert, L., Mokhatla, M.M., Hayes, J., Mpapane, N.P. (2020). Cultural ecosystem services as complex outcomes of people–nature interactions in protected areas. Ecosystem Services, 43, 101111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101111
  50. Schirpke, U., Meisch, C., Marsoner, T., Tappeiner, U. (2018). Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings. Ecosystem Services, 31, 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.017
  51. Seidzadeh, H., Rezaei, J., Hoseinzadeh, J., Pourhashemi, M., & Seyed Akhlaghi, S. J. (2022). The survey of affecting factors on tendency to participation of local people in the restoration of Oak forests involved with decline in Ilam Province. Ecology of Iranian Forest, 10(19), 136–145. )In Persian(. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/ifej.10.19.136
  52. Sgroi, F. (2020). Forest resources and sustainable tourism: A combination for the resilience of the landscape and development of mountain areas. Science of the Total Environment, 736, 139539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139539.
  53. Sherrouse, B, Clement, J. M., & Semmens, D. J. (2011). A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, 31(2), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002
  54. Siltanen, J., Petursson, J. G., Cook, D., & Davidsdottir, B. (2023). Evaluating economic impacts of protected areas in contexts with limited data: The case of three national parks in Iceland. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118085
  55. Soe, K. T., & Yeo-Chang, Y. (2019). Livelihood dependency on non-timber forest products: Implications for REDD+. Forests, 10(5), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050427
  56. Thapa, K., King, D., Banhalmi-Zakar, Z., & Diedrich, A. (2022). Nature-based tourism in protected areas: A systematic review of socio-economic benefits and costs to local people. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(7), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2073616
  57. Wang, T.­C, & Chang, T.-H. (2007). Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003
  58. You, S., Zheng, Q., Chen, B., Xu, Z., Lin, Y., Gan, M., & Wang, K. (2022). Identifying the spatiotemporal dynamics of forest ecotourism values with remotely sensed images and social media data: A perspective of public preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 130715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130715
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 April 2025
  • Revise Date: 02 June 2025
  • Accept Date: 17 July 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics